My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-03_REVISION - C1994082 (29)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2018-01-03_REVISION - C1994082 (29)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2018 9:54:48 AM
Creation date
1/4/2018 8:21:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/3/2018
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Property LLC
Type & Sequence
RN4
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
alluvial valley floors exist in the permit area or the adjacent Grassy Creek watershed <br />which are in hydrologic communication with the Yoast Mine. <br />As a result of 1990 AVF investigations in the Sage Creek watershed, Seneca Property, <br />LLC concluded there are no AVFs in this basin in hydrologic communication with the <br />Yoast Mine. Based on information submitted by the applicant; field reconnaissance; <br />interviews with farmers; and previous findings by the Division and the applicant related <br />to the Seneca II -West Mine, the Division previously did not concur with the applicant's <br />conclusion. The Division concluded that two areas along Sage Creek downstream from <br />the Yoast permit met the regulatory definition of alluvial valley floors. These areas are <br />discussed below. <br />Sage Creek Reservoir Site <br />Two fields located just upstream from the former Sage Creek Reservoir dam (Sections <br />13 and 18) are identified in the Yoast application as sub -irrigated native wetlands and <br />sub -irrigated grass hay fields. The native wetland area is basically the area once <br />covered by the reservoir, which failed in 1985. This area is currently used for grazing. <br />The area immediately upstream from the former reservoir site is currently used as a <br />grass hay field. <br />These fields are located in the upper reaches of Sage Creek, and therefore are not typical <br />of alluvial valley floors in this area with agricultural potential. However, the upper field <br />(approximately 10 acres) is currently being farmed for hay, and the other larger field <br />appears to have the potential to be put to use as a sub -irrigated hay field. Furthermore, <br />during a site visit on May 19, 1995, the upper grass hay field was being flood irrigated <br />by means of an irrigation ditch along the eastern edge of the field. This was confirmed <br />during the review of Permit Revision No. 1 (PR -1). Due to the existence of flood <br />irrigation and the presence of sub -irrigation of the unconsolidated streamlaid deposits in <br />the fields immediately upstream from the old Sage Creek Reservoir, these fields are <br />determined to be alluvial valley floors. <br />The field just above the breached Sage Creek dam is dissected by the streambed. This <br />area is undeveloped rangeland that is currently used for grazing. The limited size of the <br />field would make it difficult for farm equipment to operate. This field is not typical of <br />agriculturally productive alluvial valley floors in this region. <br />However, the upper field in Section 18, T5N R88W, is currently being farmed for hay. <br />The creek was diverted from the center to the perimeter of the field and the creek bed <br />was filled to create a manageable flood irrigated field. The field is ten acres and is flood <br />irrigated during high flow. The family that manages the field does not have adjudicated <br />water rights for the surface water in Sage Creek. They have an agreement for early <br />runoff withdrawals, allowing limited flood irrigation until mid-June when stream flows <br />decline to a level precluding further withdrawals. It is unlikely the field will be irrigated <br />with water at the projected worst-case salinity levels, but Seneca Property did provide <br />an estimate of what the potential worst-case impacts to the agricultural operation would <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.