My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-12-19_HYDROLOGY - M2004013
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2004013
>
2017-12-19_HYDROLOGY - M2004013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2017 8:08:04 AM
Creation date
12/21/2017 7:58:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004013
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
12/19/2017
Doc Name Note
12/19/2017 through 12/31/2018
Doc Name
Substitute Water Supply Plan
From
DNR Water Resources
To
DRMS
Email Name
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. William Berg, P.G. December 19, 2017 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />Under Scenario B, there will be no mining on this site during the approval period and evaporation will <br />occur from exposure of a total of 5.77 acres of water in four settling and wash ponds and in the mined <br />cell for the entirety of the approval period. No operational losses will occur under Scenario B. <br /> <br />In accordance with the letter dated April 30, 2010 (copy attached) from the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (“DRMS”), all sand and gravel mining operators must comply with <br />the requirements of the Colorado Reclamation Act and the Mineral Rules and Regulations for the <br />protection of water resources. The April 30, 2010 letter from DRMS requires that you provide <br />information to DRMS to demonstrate you can replace long term injurious stream depletions that <br />result from mining related exposure of ground water. <br /> <br />In accordance with approach nos. 1 and 3, you have indicated that a bond has been obtained for <br />$410,693 through the Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (“DRMS”) to assure that <br />depletions from groundwater evaporation do not occur in the unforeseen event, or events, which <br />would lead to the abandonment of the Pit. <br /> <br />DEPLETIONS <br /> <br />Under Scenario A, mining will occur from March through November and will result in evaporation from a <br />maximum of 4.57 acres of water in the five settling and wash ponds and a dewatering trench. Total <br />estimated annual aggregate production is 684,000 tons per year (270,000 tons of sand mined below the <br />ground water table and 414,000 tons of rock, chip, and waste mined above the ground water table). <br />The water lost with 270,000 tons of sand mined below the ground water table is 7.92 acre-feet (4% by <br />weight) for both 2017 and 2018. The total annual water consumption for dust suppression is estimated <br />at 2.52 acre-feet for both 2017 and 2018. Your attached Table 1A shows the site net evaporation <br />calculations (16.46 acre-feet) and water consumed by site operations (10.44 acre-feet). Effective <br />precipitation credit was applied to this plan. <br /> <br />Under Scenario B, evaporation will occur from exposure of a total of 5.77 acres of water in four settling <br />and wash ponds and in the mined cell. Your attached Table 1B shows the site net evaporation <br />calculations (20.27 acre-feet) and water consumed by site operations (0.0 acre-feet). Effective <br />precipitation credit was applied to this plan. <br /> <br />You have provided a monthly breakdown of lagged depletions at this site for each of the <br />aforementioned scenarios in your attached Table 2. The Glover stream depletion analytical model was <br />used to determine the lagged effects of the evaporation and operational losses from the mine. The <br />model was developed for depletions to the Arkansas River under the following assumptions: <br /> <br />● X = 2,030 feet (the distance from the centroid of the exposed surface area to the river); <br />● W = 7,875 feet (the distance from the aquifer boundary through the exposed surface area to <br />the river channel); <br />● T = 100,000 gal/day/ft (transmissivity of the alluvial aquifer between the well and the river); <br />● S = 0.2 (specific yield). <br /> <br />Table 2 shows that under Scenario A, the lagged stream depletions during the period January 2017 <br />through December 2017 are estimated to be 25.87 acre-feet and the lagged stream depletions during <br />the period January 2018 through December 2018 are estimated to be 26.72 acre-feet. These estimates <br />are based upon evaporative losses from the settling and washing ponds, mined cell, and dewatering <br />trench, water removed in the mined product, and water used for dust suppression (see attached Table <br />1A). Depletions associated with refilling Pond 5 after the dewatering stops in July were accounted for <br />in this request as shown in Table 2 under Scenario A. It was estimated that the mined cell (Pond 5) <br />would return to its approximate current level (approximately 300 feet by 200 feet by 2 feet deep) <br />within one month in November following mining. The volume of water refilled in the cell (2.75 acre- <br />feet) was added to the total evaporation and operational losses in December 2017 and December 2018,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.