My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-10-24_PERMIT FILE - M1980244 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2017-10-24_PERMIT FILE - M1980244 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2021 12:41:06 PM
Creation date
10/24/2017 3:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
10/24/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Review - Preliminary
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM12
Email Name
TC1
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Drawing C-4a. <br /> 10. Drawing C4b. In coordination with Comment 3 above, please confirm whether or not the <br /> Carlton Tunnel portion of the permit boundary includes any of Section 16 and update and <br /> resubmit Drawing C-4b as appropriate. <br /> RESPONSE:See response to Comment 3 above. Also,please find revised Drawing C-4b with <br /> the correct detail for the Carlton Tunnel in Attachment 2. <br /> §,4A EXHIBIT D—Mining Plan <br /> 11. Page D-1. In coordination with Comment 8 above, please provide some background and <br /> discussion on the proposed gas line and resubmit Exhibit D. <br /> RESPONSE: Please see response to comment 8 above. The gas line in question was never <br /> constructed nor are there plans to construct. The line has been removed from Drawing C-3. The <br /> information contained in Exhibit D is current and therefore CC&V will not be resubmitting <br /> Exhibit D. <br /> 6.4.6 EXHIBIT F—Reclamation Plan Man <br /> 12. Drawing F-2 (F-3?). Please address the following discrepancies: <br /> a The previous version of this Drawing submitted under AM-I I was numbered Drawing F-3. <br /> Drawing F-2 was for North Cresson (Globe Hill) and East Cresson (Wildhorse Extension). <br /> As the Permittee is required to only submit exhibits that change during the amendment <br /> application process, the submittal of this F-2 drawing replaces the previous North Cresson <br /> (Globe Hill) and East Cresson (Wildhorse Extension) reclamation plan details, thereby <br /> eliminating that area from the more detailed reclamation plan maps. The Division does not <br /> believe this was the intention. Please resubmit this map as Drawing F-3. <br /> b. Please also revise the"Key Map"inset at the bottom of this map to show the other Drawings <br /> F-2 through F-8 and include a note that these other maps were approved in AM-11 and have <br /> not changed in AM-12, nor will they be included in AM-12. <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> a. The drawing in question is re-submitted as Drawing F-3 in Attachment 3 to make numbering <br /> of the F-series detail maps consistent with prior permit Amendments. <br /> b. Please see Key Map at the bottom of revised Drawing F-3 included in Attachment 3. <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.