My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-01-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981041 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2017-01-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981041 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2017 10:00:10 AM
Creation date
9/28/2017 8:37:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/30/2017
Doc Name
April 2016 Electrical Resistibity Tomography Survey Investigation
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 14 Appendix 14-14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />39.13733, -108.31436 <br />Palisade, CO <br />Figure 1: General Location Map <br />Fugro Consultants Inc., (FCL) performed the geophysical surveys for Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing <br />LLC. The field data were collected between July 22 and July 25, 2016 by Sr. Staff Geophysicist Lincoln Steele <br />and Associate Geologist Jamey Turner. <br />Data Acquisition <br />The objective of this revised geophysical investigation was to use electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) to map <br />potential groundwater pathways draining into the abandoned mine workings of the Snowcap coal mine. FCL <br />deployed the AGI R8 SuperSting resistivity system over eight North-South survey alignments on site. The R8 <br />system is an 8 channel, 84 electrode systems capable of measuring a variety of resistivity arrays during each <br />survey. The survey lines were 124.5 meters in length (full 84 electrode array) with even 1.5 meter electrode <br />spacing. A targeted resistivity survey comprised of the Dipole/Dipole method was used to best image the <br />subsurface along each profile. The survey lines were adjusted over the site to best evaluate potential subsurface <br />anomalies and pathways in the area of concern. The first line (SR8) was collected just west of the ditch <br />sinkholes but still within the area underlain by the mine workings. Figure 2 shows the survey area with each of <br />the eight new ERT profiles (labeled SR) and original seven profiles (labelled L), noted surface features, and the <br />boundaries of the imaged ERT anomaly from the first survey. <br />Project/Proposal No. 04.79160011 August 23, 2016 Page 2 of 7 <br />TR -69 A14-15-5 09/16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.