My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-09-20_INSPECTION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2017-09-20_INSPECTION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2017 7:44:48 AM
Creation date
9/26/2017 6:25:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
9/20/2017
Doc Name Note
OSM Inspection Report
From
OSM
To
DRMS
Inspection Date
8/29/2017
Email Name
RAR
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Findings and observations <br />The Team evaluated the following parcels for post -mining topography, surface stability, and <br />drainage control: <br />• F -A-16 (3.7 ac.) <br />• K -A-16 (32.9 ac.) <br />• Z -A-14 (2.0 ac.) <br />• Z -A-15 (26.9 ac.) <br />• Z -A-16 (88.4 ac.) <br />• A -B-09 (0.3 ac.) <br />• A -B-14 (2.7 ac.) <br />• A -B-16 (18.4 ac.) <br />To verify backfill to approximate original contour, DRMS collects GPS -generated elevation <br />readings along randomly generated transects in each reclaimed parcel. The Team collected a total <br />of 38 elevation points for comparison against pre -mining topography data. The Team also took <br />measurements for gradient using a manual clinometer; the slopes of the reclaimed parcels ranged <br />from 1° to 30°. <br />Overall, surface stability was very good. Volunteer annual and seeded perennial vegetation was <br />sufficiently established to control erosion. Reconstructed stream channels featured check dams in <br />steep areas to reduce hydrologic velocity. All highwall had been eliminated, and no settling, <br />slumping, slides, scarps, or other major instability of the backfilled overburden and topsoil was <br />noted. See Figure 1. <br />Limited erosional features caught the attention of the Team. Specifically: <br />• Rilling at previously repaired reclaimed parcel Z -A-16. See Figure 2. <br />• Headcutting within the Z -A-16 reconstructed drainage channel (east fork). See Figure 3 <br />• Minor headcutting within the Z -A-16 reconstructed drainage channel (west fork). See <br />Figure 4. <br />Mr. Roberts agreed to monitor and/or repair these areas of concern as appropriate. The Division <br />inspector plans to follow up during the next regularly scheduled minesite inspection. <br />Conclusion and recommendations <br />The Phase I reclamation evaluated during this inspection comports with the terms of the Trapper <br />permit, the approved Colorado regulatory program, and supports the post mining land use of <br />rangeland. Contingent on the Division's satisfactory followup inspection of the three repair items <br />noted above, I recommend Phase I release for all 175.3 acres of reclamation evaluated this day. <br />C. DRMS; Denver, Colorado <br />Trapper Mining, Inc; Craig, Colorado <br />Colorado State Land Board; Denver, Colorado <br />Bureau of Land Management; Craig, Colorado <br />2 1 P a g e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.