Laserfiche WebLink
LJLM7AY SILVER MINE5 <br /> the Revenue Seep (SW-3). The attached Map shows these sampling locations. All graphing includes non- <br /> detects at the full diction limit value. <br /> Iron, dissolved <br /> J <br /> 1.5 <br /> E <br /> c 1 — <br /> G GW-3A <br /> a 0.5 c <br /> —�—GW-3B <br /> o Nov-13 Jun-14 Dec-14 1u1-15 Jan-16 Aug-16 Mar-17 Sep-17 Standard <br /> v <br /> Date <br /> Lead, dissolved <br /> J <br /> - 0.2 <br /> 0.15o <br /> C <br /> 0.1 G A GW-3A <br /> 0.05 -- -GW-3B <br /> c 0 <br /> O Nov-13 Jun-14 Dec-14 Jul-15 Jan-16 Aug-16 Mar-17 Sep-17 Standard <br /> v <br /> Date <br /> Silver, dissolved <br /> J <br /> 0.003 <br /> c 0.002 G <br /> ° e GW-3A <br /> M- 0.001 <br /> c <br /> e —f—GW-38 <br /> u 0 <br /> o Nov-13 Jun-14 Dec-14 Jul-15 Jan-16 Aug-16 Mar-17 Sep-17 Standard <br /> Date <br /> Timeseries (above) for iron, lead, and silver reveal that Q2 2017 GW-3A results for these metals are <br /> generally an order-of-magnitude greater than previously detected. Visual comparison of the results for <br /> these constituents over time also reveals excursions from typical conditions in the past. <br /> Bar charts(below) comparing Q2 2017 GW-3A results to upgradient surface water(SW-15 and SW-16), <br /> mine water(MWP Inlet) and the Revenue Seep (SW-3) demonstrate that upgradient surface water has <br /> 2 1 P a g e <br />