My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-07-31_REVISION - M1991133
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1991133
>
2017-07-31_REVISION - M1991133
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:33:32 PM
Creation date
7/31/2017 4:42:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991133
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/31/2017
Doc Name
Application
From
Robins Construction
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
DMC
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Located in Water Division No. 3, the Rio Grande Basin, as promulgated by the State <br />Engineer on June 30, 2005, and any amendments thereto. <br />24. Accounting Forms: Applicant shall measure diversions and account for <br />operations under this Decree using accounting form(s) acceptable to the Division <br />Engineer, and shall provide summaries of such accounting as requested by the <br />Division Engineer. <br />25. Curtailment: Pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-305(8), the State Engineer shall <br />curtail all out -of -priority diversions, the depletions from which are not so replaced as <br />to prevent injury to vested water rights. <br />26. Retained Jurisdiction: Pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-304(6), the Court shall <br />retain jurisdiction over the change of water rights and plan for augmentation <br />approved herein for a period of five years from the date of this Decree for <br />reconsideration of the question of whether the provisions of this decree are sufficient <br />to prevent material injury to any vested water rights or decreed conditional water <br />rights. The Court's retained jurisdiction may be invoked by any party to this case by <br />the filing of a timely motion or petition with appropriate notice to all parties. The <br />party lodging the petition shall have the burden of going forward to establish the <br />facts alleged in the petition. If this Court finds those facts to be established, <br />Applicant shall bear the burden of proving that (1) any modification sought by <br />Applicant will avoid injury to other appropriators; (2) any modification sought by <br />Objectors is not required to avoid injury to other appropriators; or (3) any term or <br />condition proposed by Applicant in response to any Objector's petition avoids injury <br />to other appropriators. <br />27. No Precedent Established: This Ruling is the product of compromise and <br />settlement negotiations between the parties hereto and the issues were not actually <br />litigated. Accordingly, nothing in this Ruling shall be construed to preclude any party <br />from litigating, in any different case involving the same or similar issues, any matter <br />determined in this Ruling. The facts of this case are unique and therefore this Ruling <br />is not intended to be, and shall not be, construed as a binding precedent in other <br />cases now pending or hereafter filed in the District Court for Water Division No. 3. <br />Dated this day of , 2017 <br />Nicolas Sarmiento <br />Water Referee <br />Water Division No_ 3 <br />, .. 0013 'x` <br />Summit Engineering Job Number: 1707122CE 37 <br />719-589-6147 <br />,{ Alamosa, CO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.