My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-07-27_REVISION - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2017-07-27_REVISION - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2017 8:15:01 AM
Creation date
7/28/2017 8:03:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/27/2017
Doc Name
Request for Technical Revision
From
Climax Molybdenum
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR26
Email Name
ECS
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Final Compensatory Mitigation and Monitoring Plan—Version 2.0 <br />Climax Mine Overburden Storage Facility Expansion (SPK-2013-00045) <br />March 2017 Bikis Water Consultants, a division of SGM Page 4 <br />more detail in this Plan, use of this site has a very high likelihood of success. Figure 1 shows <br />the locations of the overburden expansion in McNulty Gulch and the Lake Irwin mitigation site. <br />The mitigation included in this Plan will be provided using a phased approach that corresponds <br />with the timing of wetland impacts from OSF expansion. While this Plan is based on meeting all <br />the mitigation requirements with on-site mitigation at the Lake Irwin site, it is possible that credits <br />from the CRCR or the ILF Program at Camp Hale could be used for mitigation in the future. If <br />this is the case, then Climax would submit a request to modify the mitigation plan. <br />3.0 OBJECTIVES <br />The objectives of this Plan were developed following the requirements provided in the 2015 <br />Guidelines. These objectives as they relate to the proposed Plan are to: <br />1. Provide a functional gain in wetlands from the mitigation compared to the impacted <br />wetlands. <br />2. Provide mitigation within the same watershed in which the wetland impacts occur. <br />3. Provide types of mitigation geared to replace the loss of aquatic resources. <br />4. Design the mitigation to be self-sustaining and not require routine operation and <br />maintenance. <br />5. Make sure the mitigation ratio reflects the type(s) of mitigation and associated likelihood <br />of success. <br />6. Consider any temporal losses of wetland functions. <br />7. Account for any indirect impacts with the mitigation. <br />The compensatory mitigation described in this Plan will establish 36.312 acres of diverse <br />wetlands and aquatic resources, including mostly willow scrub-shrub wetland, and also <br />emergent wetland, shallow aquatic habitat, and perennial channel to compensate for 16.48 <br />acres of wetlands and other waters impacted by the OSF expansion. This represents a ratio of <br />2.2:1 (mitigation to impacts).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.