Laserfiche WebLink
2.04.9 Soils Resource Information <br />tolerated depending upon the size and the intended use of the reclaimed area. If the <br />size of rock fragments exceed ten inches, the problems are more severe (USDA, 1978). <br />Coarse fragments are evaluated based on pedon descriptions for soils on site. Most <br />soils are rated good throughout. Few horizons tested have more than 15 percent coarse <br />fragments larger than three inches and are rated fair. No soils are rated poor for coarse <br />fragments. <br />EVALUATION OF SURFACE MATERIAL ON MINE BENCHES <br />In response to Stipulation Number 6 attached to the original permit, Grand Valley <br />submitted a composite analysis of the surface material at the McClane Canyon Mine <br />site. The analysis indicated "slightly elevated SAR levels at both sites, and elevated salt <br />level at McClane Canyon, and a very high pH at Munger Canyon." (CMLR 8,9,85) <br />A second series of samples were taken at McClane Canyon to determine if the <br />elevated levels of SAR and salt were concentrated in the surface layer and would <br />necessitate special handling of the surface layer during reclamation. The samples were <br />taken on August 6, 1985 from four locations on both the upper and lower benches. After <br />the samples were collected they were combined and split to yield a sample from both <br />benches. Shown below are the results of sampling. <br />These data indicate that the elevated levels of salts and SAR are not <br />concentrated in the surface layers at the mine site and that no special handling of the <br />surface layers is necessary. Table 4.4-1 shows ranges of suitability for each parameter. <br />PRESENT AND POTENTIAL USES <br />CROPS AND PASTURELANDS <br />The SCS has made prime farmland determinations and published a map of prime <br />farmlands in Garfield County (USDA - SCS, 1979). There are no prime farmlands <br />mapped by the SCS in the permit area. A written negative determination was requested <br />from the SCS and is contained in Appendix L. None of the soils mapped at the site has <br />potential for crops or pastureland, unless irrigated. <br />There are no cultivated soils in the permit area nor have they been cultivated in <br />the past. <br />PR -02 2.04-48 10112 <br />Original Sample <br />Upper Bench <br />Lower Bench <br />PH <br />8.4 <br />7.25 <br />7.4 <br />SAR <br />5.5 <br />2.12 <br />1.32 <br />Soluble Salts <br />6.0 <br />3.70 <br />3.4 <br />(by conductivity) <br />These data indicate that the elevated levels of salts and SAR are not <br />concentrated in the surface layers at the mine site and that no special handling of the <br />surface layers is necessary. Table 4.4-1 shows ranges of suitability for each parameter. <br />PRESENT AND POTENTIAL USES <br />CROPS AND PASTURELANDS <br />The SCS has made prime farmland determinations and published a map of prime <br />farmlands in Garfield County (USDA - SCS, 1979). There are no prime farmlands <br />mapped by the SCS in the permit area. A written negative determination was requested <br />from the SCS and is contained in Appendix L. None of the soils mapped at the site has <br />potential for crops or pastureland, unless irrigated. <br />There are no cultivated soils in the permit area nor have they been cultivated in <br />the past. <br />PR -02 2.04-48 10112 <br />