Laserfiche WebLink
In TRIM <br />COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Control Division <br />Fact Sheet- Page 19, Permit No. C00000906 <br />Total Recoverable Trivalent Chromium <br />A quantitative RP analysis was conducted for outfall 001 based on the WQBEL and ADBAC as calculated in the <br />WQA. A qualitative RP analysis was conducted for outfalls 007, 008 and 010 as chromium is identified in the <br />ELG Development Document as a parameter that can be found in alkaline coal -related discharges. <br />Outfall 001: total chromium data was used for the RP analysis as total recoverable trivalent chromium data <br />was not available. The MEPC was less than half of the MAPC and therefore limitations are not necessary at <br />this time. However, because the parameter is identified in the ELG Development Document, a qualitative <br />monitoring determination was made to ensure that sufficient data is available to support future RP <br />determinations. Therefore, a semi-annual monitoring requirement is included in the permit. <br />Outfalls 007, 008, and 010: a qualitative monitoring determination was made because the outfalls convey <br />surface flow from the active mining area. The treatment provided by sedimentation ponds approved under <br />the SMCRA authority are not expressly designed for all pollutants regulated under the WQCA, including <br />metals removal, and for outfall 010, no treatment technology is implemented. A semi-annual monitoring <br />requirement has been added to the permit for these outfalls for the collection of data to support future RP <br />determinations. <br />Potentially Dissolved Trivalent Chromium <br />A quantitative RP analysis was conducted for outfall 001 based on the WQBEL and ADBAC as calculated in the <br />WQA. A qualitative RP analysis was conducted for 007, 008, and 010 as chromium is identified in the ELG <br />Development Document as a parameter that can be found in alkaline coal -related discharges. <br />Outfall 001: total chromium data was used for the RP analysis as potentially dissolved trivalent chromium <br />data was not available. The MEPC was less than half of the MAPC and therefore limitations are not <br />necessary at this time. The monitoring data do not indicate a limitation is necessary, and total recoverable <br />trivalent chromium monitoring data can be used to evaluate dissolved trivalent chromium concentrations. <br />Outfalls 007, 008, and 010: a qualitative monitoring determination was made because the outfalls convey <br />surface flow from the active mining area. The treatment provided by sedimentation ponds approved under <br />the SMCRA authority are not expressly designed for all pollutants regulated under the WQCA, including <br />metals removal, and for outfall 010, no treatment technology is implemented. Total recoverable trivalent <br />chromium monitoring data can be used to evaluate dissolved trivalent chromium concentrations; therefore, <br />no additional chromium monitoring requirements are necessary at these outfalls. <br />Potentially Dissolved Hexavalent Chromium <br />A qualitative RP analysis was conducted for outfalls 001, 007, 008 and 010 as chromium is identified in the <br />ELG Development Document as a parameter that can be found in alkaline coal -related discharges. According to <br />the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, hexavalent chromium is produced by industrial <br />processes. Activities at this facility would not generate hexavalent chromium. A qualitative determination of <br />no RP has been made and the evaluation for chromium is limited to the trivalent form. <br />Potentially Dissolved Copper <br />A quantitative RP analysis was conducted for outfall 001 based on facility data and the WQBELs and ADBACs as <br />calculated in the WQA. A qualitative RP analysis was conducted for outfalls 007, 008, and 010 as copper is <br />identified in the ELG Development Document as a parameter that can be found in alkaline coal -related <br />discharges. <br />Outfall 001: The MEPC was greater than the MAPC and therefore limitations are required. This is a new <br />limitation and previous monitoring indicates that the permittee may not be able to consistently meet the <br />limitations for the 30 -day average; therefore, a compliance schedule for the 30 -day average limitation with <br />interim limits based on monitoring data (the highest actual 30 -day average) has been added to the permit. <br />Note that the daily maximum limitation is effective immediately. <br />Outfalls 007, 008, and 010: a qualitative monitoring determination was made because the outfalls convey <br />surface flow from the active mining area. The treatment provided by sedimentation ponds approved under <br />the SMCRA authority are not expressly designed for all pollutants regulated under the WQCA, including <br />metals removal, and for outfall 010, no treatment technology is implemented. Therefore, a quarterly <br />