Laserfiche WebLink
In TRIM <br />COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Control Division <br />Fact Sheet- Page 16, Permit No. C00000906 <br />A qualitative determination of RP may be made where ancillary and/or additional treatment <br />technologies are employed to reduce the concentrations of certain pollutants. Because it may be <br />anticipated that the limits for a parameter could not be met without treatment, and the treatment is <br />not coincidental to the movement of water through the facility, limits may be included to assure that <br />treatment is maintained. <br />A qualitative RP determination may also be made where a federal ELG exists for a parameter, and <br />where the results of a quantitative analysis results in no RP. As the federal ELG is typically less <br />stringent than a limitation based on the WQBELs, if the discharge was to contain concentrations at the <br />ELG (above the WQBEL), the discharge may cause or contribute to an exceedance of a water quality <br />standard. <br />For this renewal, the division also used information provided in the US EPA Development Document for <br />Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Coal Mining Point Source Category, October 1982 <br />(the development document for the federal ELG), which identifies various metals and other parameters <br />that can be found in alkaline coal -related discharges, as part of the qualitative RP analysis. Those <br />metals with no or limited detects (i.e., less than 20%), as documented in the development document, <br />were typically not considered further in the qualitative RP analysis, nor were those metals for which a <br />water quality standard was not identified for the receiving stream. The metals and other parameters <br />considered from the development document are: arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, <br />mercury, selenium, manganese, and zinc; chloride and sulfide. <br />To conduct a quantitative RP analysis, a minimum of 10 effluent data points from the previous 5 years, <br />should be used. The equations set out in the guidance for normal and lognormal distribution, where <br />applicable, are used to calculate the maximum estimated pollutant concentration (MEPC). For data <br />sets with non -detect values, and where at least 30% of the data set was greater than the detection <br />level, MDLWIN software is used consistent with Division guidance to generate the mean and standard <br />deviation, which are then used to establish the multipliers used to calculate the MEPC. If the MDLWIN <br />program cannot be used the Division's guidance prescribes the use of best professional judgment. <br />For some parameters, recent effluent data or an appropriate number of data points may not be <br />available, or collected data may be in the wrong form (dissolved vs total) and therefore may not be <br />available for use in conducting an RP analysis. Thus, consistent with Division procedures, monitoring <br />will be required to collect samples to support a RP analysis and subsequent decisions for a numeric <br />Limit. A compliance schedule may be added to the permit to require the request of an RP analysis once <br />the appropriate data have been collected. <br />For other parameters, effluent data may be available to conduct a quantitative analysis, and therefore <br />an RP analysis will be conducted to determine if there is RP for the effluent discharge to cause or <br />contribute to exceedances of ambient water quality standards. The guidance specifies that if the MEPC <br />exceeds the maximum allowable pollutant concentration (MAPC), limits must be established and where <br />the MEPC is greater than half the MAPC (but less than the MAPC), monitoring must be established. <br />Tables VII -4 and 5 below contain the calculated MEPC compared to the corresponding MAPC, and the <br />results of the quantitative reasonable potential evaluation for those parameters that met the data <br />requirements, as described above. For parameters that did not meet the data requirements for a <br />quantitative RP analysis, a qualitative RP analysis was conducted. The RP determination is discussed <br />for each parameter in the Parameter Evaluation section of this document (Section VII.B). <br />