My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-06-06_PERMIT FILE - M2017009
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017009
>
2017-06-06_PERMIT FILE - M2017009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2020 3:58:32 AM
Creation date
6/7/2017 7:45:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017009
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/6/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #4
From
Randy Schafer
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
} <br /> 40586 Co. Road 21 <br /> Haxtun, CO 80731 <br /> May 29, 2017 <br /> JUN 0 0 2017 <br /> Mr. Jared Ebert DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist III MINING&SAFETy <br /> Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> RE: PVRE Pit#1, M-2017-009,New 110 Construction Materials Reclamation Permit <br /> Application, Adequacy Review No. 4 <br /> Dear Mr. Ebert: <br /> We are submitting a response and information to your adequacy Review No. 4 dated May 25, <br /> 2017. All responses are in bold print. <br /> The Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (Division)received your response to <br /> the Division's third adequacy review on May 25, 2017. An electronic copy was sent to the <br /> Division on May 19, 2017. The application has been revised to include the acreage associated <br /> with the proposed access road to the site. Overall,the adequacy review items from the Division's <br /> previous letters have been addressed. However, based on the new exhibits submitted, several <br /> new items have been identified. Please address the following issues: <br /> Exhibit E - Maps <br /> 1. Included with the submittal were several revised maps. The map labeled Exhibit E- Location <br /> Map, is not drawn to scale and the boundaries of the permit area were labeled and the length of <br /> each side of the affected boundary are shown on the map. This map and the perimeter of the <br /> affected area depicts a permit area of 9.9 acres including the affected area associated with the <br /> proposed access road and the pit excavation. The following maps were also revised and <br /> submitted: Exhibit E—Aerial Photo Map, Reclamation Map and Mining Plan Map. Using the <br /> scales shown on each of these maps,the boundary shown on these revised maps do not match the <br /> Exhibit E—Location Map perimeter lengths. Given this, the affected land boundaries shown on <br /> these maps depict an area larger than the proposed 9.9 acre permit boundary. The pit area alone <br /> on the Mining Plan and Reclamation Plan map depicts an area of about 10.02 acres without <br /> including the access road acreage. Please revise these maps (Aerial Photo Map, Mining Plan <br /> Map and Reclamation Plan Map)to show the revised permit boundary at the correct and <br /> appropriate scale in accordance with Rule 6.2.1(2). <br /> P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.