My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-04-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2017-04-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 10:14:52 AM
Creation date
4/10/2017 10:12:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/5/2017
Doc Name Note
Includes Reclamation Cost Estimate
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
Seneca Property LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JDM
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
770 feet of artesian head in a well. It should be noted that the amount of head is <br />areally variable as the aquifer conditions change from water table (unconfined) near <br />outcrops to confined conditions at depth. <br />Due to mining methods and the thickness and type of interburden between the Wolf <br />Creek and Wadge, pit inflows from upward movement of the Wolf Creek are not <br />expected. If fracturing of the interburden and/or the Wolf Creek coal, due to blasting <br />or unloading of materials (overburden and Wadge coal seam), were to occur, it is <br />estimated that 80% of the Wolf Creek head would be lost to friction, leaving a <br />maximum total head of about 155 feet, which could potentially result in minor <br />inflow. <br />The aquifer characteristics of the Wolf Creek (low transmissivity and storativity <br />values) indicate that very little water is available for upward movement. Due to the <br />distance between the Wadge and Wolf Creek, fracturing of the Wolf Creek due to <br />mining is improbable. Inflow from the Wolf Creek coal seam into the open or <br />reclaimed pits is not expected to occur. <br />The Wadge coal and its overburden, which may locally contain the Lennox coal <br />seam, generally stores and transmits water. During mining, water flowed into active <br />and reclaimed pits. This water flowed mainly from the Wadge coal, but also from <br />the overburden. The operator estimated the following values for aquifer <br />characteristics in the Wadge Coal and Wadge Overburden: <br />* Hydraulic conductivity of overburden = .01 ft./day <br />* Hydraulic conductivity of coal = 0.02 ft./day (north pit), .01 ft. day (south pit) <br />* Storativity = 10-2 for both aquifers <br />* Transmissivity = 4.5 ft. 2/day for overburden <br />* Transmissivity = 0.12 ft. 2/day for coal <br />* Hydraulic gradient of overburden = .165 (north pit), .085 (south pit) <br />* Hydraulic gradient of coal = .15 (north pit), .11 (south pit) <br />The preceding estimated values for hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity are <br />somewhat lower than most values reported for these aquifers by mines in the area. <br />Tables 5 and 6 in Robson and Stewart's (1990) report indicates ranges in hydraulic <br />conductivity from 0.1 to 0.6 ft./day for the overburden aquifer and two values of .02 <br />and .4 ft./day for the Wadge Coal. <br />The Division's PHC findings are based on the possibility of greater inflows than <br />those predicted by the applicant. The Williams Fork Formation overburden, which <br />locally contains the Lennox Coal Seam, may contain perched aquifers. It may also <br />act as a limited aquifer system near the Wadge coal. The overburden does not <br />contain or transport significant amounts of water in this area. <br />The applicant states that no hydrologic effects due to mining will be noticed at <br />Temple Well No. 1 (a domestic water right), located south and west of the mine site. <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.