My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-04-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2017-04-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2017 10:14:52 AM
Creation date
4/10/2017 10:12:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/5/2017
Doc Name Note
Includes Reclamation Cost Estimate
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
Seneca Property LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JDM
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1) the drawdown of ground water, due to pit dewatering, for a few hundred to <br />perhaps 1,000 feet from the pit; <br />2) possibly diminished quantity and quality of water in the Temple Well no. 1; <br />3) the probable dewatering and degradation of quality in three to five springs in <br />the permit area, two of which are used for stock watering purposes; <br />4) the possible increase in water quantity and decrease in quality of alluvial water <br />in Hubberson Gulch and its unnamed tributary along the access road, due to <br />infiltration of spoils discharge; and <br />5) the establishment of a relatively unconfined aquifer of poor quality in the <br />backfilled pits. <br />During mining, inflows may be expected to develop from perched aquifers within <br />the Williams Fork overburden, from a limited Williams Fork overburden aquifer, <br />and from the Wadge coal aquifer. Coal removal is by an updip strip method. As a <br />general rule, more water will be encountered at the first cut than when the operation <br />proceeds updip. Inflows from units underlying the Wadge are not expected, as <br />mining methods should not cause fracturing of the relatively impermeable <br />underlying materials. Regional aquifers located in or near the permit area include <br />the Tow Creek Sandstone, Trout Creek Sandstone and Twenty Mile Sandstone. <br />The Twenty Mile Sandstone lies stratigraphically above the Wadge coal (the seam <br />being mined) by about 525 feet. The Twenty Mile Sandstone, which has been eroded <br />over much of the Seneca II -W Mine area, will not be disturbed by mining operations, <br />so its water quality and quantity will not be affected. <br />The Tow Creek Sandstone lies more than 1300 feet below the Wadge coal. Due to <br />the thickness of the interburden between the Tow Creek and Wadge, it is not likely <br />that hydraulic pressures capable of affecting this aquifer will develop. Therefore, <br />mining activities are not expected to disturb this regional aquifer. <br />About 200 feet below the Wadge coal lies the Trout Creek Sandstone. The <br />Trout Creek is thought to be an aquifer of regional significance, but is not monitored <br />at this site. The applicant completed a water supply well in the Trout Creek from <br />which they sustain an average pumping rate of 35 gallons per minute. The relatively <br />impermeable interburden between the Wadge coal and the Trout Creek Sandstone <br />(which includes the Wolf Creek coal) and the stratigraphic distance between them <br />will preclude impacts to the Trout Creek sandstone from mining. <br />The Wolf Creek coal seam, which lies 150 to 170 feet below the Wadge coal seam, <br />is the first significant aquifer below the mined seam. This seam, which is up to 12 <br />feet thick, appears to be saturated in this area. Due to the dip of the unit and the <br />confining nature of the overburden and underburden, the Wolf Creek has as much as <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.