2017-04-06_INSPECTION - M1980244 (2)

Home Browse Search

ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334.5493 Mid Continent Testing Labs, Inc ACZ Project ID: L34283 ACZ M WORKNUM PARAMETER METHOD ... L34283.04 WG414562 Carbon, total (TC) ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 Combust"R 06 Sample was received above recommended temperature ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 Combust"R RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data 06 Sample was received above recommended temperature ASA No.9 29-2.2 4 CombustiWR validation because the concentration of the duplicated validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL), Carbon. total organic (TOC) ASA No.9 29-2 2 4 Combust"R OB Sample was received above recommended temperature. ASA No.9 29-2.2 4 Combust"R RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< lox MDL). WG414410 Sulfur Organic Residual M60012-75.054 3.2.4 -MOD validation because the concentration of the duplicated validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< t Ox MDL), WG414570 Neutralization Potential as CaCO3 10600,12-78-054 3.2.3 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data See Case Narrative validation because the concentration of the duplicated RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL), WG414410 Sulfur Organic Residual M600r2-79.054 3.2.4 -MOD RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data 06 Sample was received above recommended temperature ASA No.9 29-2 2 4 CombusticWIR validation because the concentration of the duplicated validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample Is too low for accurate evaluation (< t Ox MDL), Sulfur Pyritic Sulfide M600.-2-7&054 3.2.4 -MOR R1 RPD exceeded the method or laboratory acceptance limit. ASA No.9 29-2.2 4 CombustionllR RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data See Case Narrative. Sulfur Sulfate M60012-79-054 3.2.4 -MOD RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data WG414670 Neutralization Potential as CaCO3 M600l2-78-054 3.2.3 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< cox MDL). L34283-05 WG414562 Carbon, total (TC) ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 Combus0WR 06 Sample was received above recommended temperature ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 CombusWMR RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< lox MDL). Carbon, total organic (TOC) ASA No.9 29-2 2 4 Combust"R 06 Sample was received above recommended temperature ASA No.9 29-2.2 4 CombustiWR RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< lox MDL). WG414670 Neutralization Potential as CaCO3 M60012-75-054 3.2.3 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< lox MDL). WG414410 Sulfur Organic Residual M60012-75.054 3.2.4 -MOD RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (c 10x MDL). Sulfur Pyritic Sulfide M60012-78-054 3.2.4 -MOD Rt RPD exceeded the method or laboratory acceptance limit. See Case Narrative Sulfur Sulfate 10600!2-70-054 3.2.4 -Moo RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< t0x MDL). L34283-06 WG414562 Carbon, total (TC) ASA No.9 29-2.2 4 Combustion/iR 06 Sample was received above recommended temperature ASA No.9 29-2 2 4 CombusticWIR RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for date validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< cox MDL). Carbon, total organic (TOC) ASA No.9 29-2 2 4 CombusSWR 06 Sample was received above recommended temperature ASA No.9 29-2.2 4 CombustionllR RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). WG414670 Neutralization Potential as CaCO3 M600l2-78-054 3.2.3 RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< cox MDL). WG414410 Sulfur Organic Residual M6o0l2-78-054 3.2.4 -MOD RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< cox MDL). Sulfur Pyritic Sulfide 1060012-78-054 3.2.4 -MOD R1 RPD exceeded the method or laboratory acceptance limit See Case Narrative Sulfur Sulfate 1060012-78-054 3.2.4 -MOD RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the concentration of the duplicated sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< cox MDL) REPAD.15.06.05.01 —� L34283-1612131713 Page 11 of 15