2017-04-06_INSPECTION - M1980244 ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: M1980244
• IBM Index Class Name: Inspection
• Doc Date: 4/6/2017
• Doc Name: Response
• From: Newmont / CC&V
• To: DRMS
• Email Name: AME
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhffl Drive Steamboat Springs. CO 80487 [phone]
Mid Continent Testing Labs, Inc
ACZ Project ID: L34283
ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER ..
L34283-01 WG414562 Carbon total (TC) ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 CombusWMR
06 Sample was received above recommended temperature.
ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 CombusWMR
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation bemuse the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
Carbon total organic (TOC) ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 Combustion/1111
05 Sample was received above recommended temperature.
ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 CombusWMR
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation bemuse the concentration of the duplicated
sample Is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
WG414570 Neutralization Potential as CSC03 M60012-76.054 3.2.3
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation bemuse the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
WG414410 Sulfur Organic Residual M60012-70-054 3.2.."00
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the concentration of the duplicated
sample Is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
Sulfur Pyritic Sulfide M60012-70-054 3.2.4 -MOD
R1 RPD exceeded the method or laboratory acceptance lim it.
See Case Narrative.
Sul" Sulfate M60012-78054 3.2.4 -MOD
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation bemuse the concentration of the duplicated
sample Is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
L34253-02 WG414562 Carbon total (TC) ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 CombusWMR
06 Sample was received above recommended temperature.
ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 CombustiordIR
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation bemuse the concentration of the duplicated
sample Is too low for accurate evaluation (< lax MDL)
Carbon total organic (TOC) ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 CombusWMR
06 Sample was received above recommended temperature.
ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 CombuslionAR
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation bemuse the coneer4ration of the duplicated
sample is too law for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL)
WG414570 Neutralisation Potential as CaCO3 M60012-78054 3.2.3
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation bemuse the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
WG414410 Sulfur Organic Residual M60012-78054 3.2.4 -MOD
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation bemuse the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 O MDL)
Sulfur Pyritic Sulfide 1060012-78.054 3.2.4 -MOD
R1 RPD exceeded the method or laboratory acceptance I;miL
See Case Narrative.
Sulfur Sulfate M60012-78054 3.2.4 -MOD
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation bemuse the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
11.3421113-03 WG414662 Carbon. total (TC) ASA No.9 29-2.2.4 CombusWrVIR
06 Sample was received above recommended temperature.
ASA No.0 29-2.2.4 CombustbMR
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for date
validation because the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1ox MDL).
Carbon total organic (TOC) ASA No.9 29-2 2.4 CombustioMR
06 Sample was received above recommended temperature.
ASA No.9 29-2 2.4 CombustkwAR
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for date
validation because the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too low for accurate evaluation (c lox MDL).
WG414570 Neutralization Potential as CaCO3 M60012-76-054 3.2.3
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for da'w
validation because the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1ox MDL).
WG414410 Sulfur Organic Residual M60012-78-054 3.2.4 -MOD
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD)was not used for data
validation because the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too law for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
Sulfur Pyritic Sulfide M60012-78-054 3.2.4 -MOD
R1 RPD exceeded the method or laboratory acceptance limit.
See Case Narrative
Sulfur Sulfate M600/2-78-054 3.2.4 -MOD
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the concentration of the duplicated
sample is too tow for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL)
REPAD.15,06.05.01
L34283-1612131713 Page 10 of 15