My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-28_REPORT - C1981028 (30)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2017-02-28_REPORT - C1981028 (30)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 8:19:27 AM
Creation date
3/1/2017 7:02:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/28/2017
Doc Name
Annual Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2016
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
RAR
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Keenesburg Mine 2016 Vegetation Monitoring Report <br />Z2 Herbaceous Production <br />Based on the results of the herbaceous production sampling, four of five Reclamation Areas <br />exceeded the production success standard calculated value (Table 19). However, Reclamation <br />Area 31 fell short. <br />Table 19: Herbaceous Production Success Standard Comparison <br />Herbaceous Production <br />(g/m2) <br />Reclamation Area <br />23 <br />25 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />Mean <br />215.9 <br />185.5 <br />236.7 <br />270.7 <br />140.2 <br />Mean (minus noxious) <br />209.3 <br />179.6 <br />229.6 <br />258.7 <br />109.2 <br />St Dev (minus noxious) <br />98.5 <br />64.8 <br />146.6 <br />176.7 <br />42.2 <br />N <br />5 <br />15 <br />15 <br />15 <br />15 <br />Nmin <br />52 <br />24 <br />74 <br />1 84 <br />27 <br />Standard <br />186.9 <br />90% of Standard <br />168.2 <br />Standard Passed? <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />I Yes <br />No <br />Herbaceous production increased substantially in all four Reclamation Areas that were <br />monitored in 2015 and these increases were most pronounced in the perennial grass species <br />(Figure 9). In 2012, perennial grasses comprised 95-100% of the herbaceous production in each <br />of these areas. However, by 2015, not only has the overall production decreased, but perennial <br />grasses contributed less than 50% in Reclamation Areas 23, 29, and 30. In 2016, perennial <br />grasses were back to their 2012 production levels as well as being considerable higher overall. <br />The large increase in annual introduced forbs (primarily prickly lettuce) was the primary <br />difference between the 2012 and 2016 data. <br />The reasons for the increase in production are likely the same as those postulated above <br />regarding vegetation cover. Three years of above average precipitation has allowed these <br />Reclamation Areas to recover from the drought they experienced in 2012 and 2013. Further, the <br />timing of the precipitation in 2016 with consistently above average precipitation every month <br />from March through June and a spike in July (225% of average) gave the annual species a boost <br />that likely allowed them to persist into the growing season longer than usual. Often the cool <br />season annual species have already completed their life cycle by the time monitoring occurs in <br />August and do not contribute as much to the production data. <br />Habitat Management, Inc. 28 October 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.