Laserfiche WebLink
Notice of the Applicant's filing occurred in accordance with the general requirements of the Act <br />and Rules. The public comment period closed on January 5, 2017. During the public comment <br />period the Division received written comments from the following individuals and agencies: <br />Timely Letter of Objection: <br />1. Robert and Alane Wooster, December 15, 2016, received December 20, 2016 <br />Timely Commenting Agencies: <br />2. History Colorado, SHPO, dated December 5, 2016, received December 9, 2016 <br />3. Colorado Division of Water Resources, dated December 15, 2016, received December <br />16, 2016 <br />The Division has forwarded copies of all comments to the Applicant, scheduled a hearing before <br />the Board, and scheduled a Pre -hearing Conference. The Division has provided notice of the <br />scheduled Board hearing and Pre -hearing Conference to all parties and interested persons. <br />During the application review process period the Division provided two adequacy letters to the <br />Applicant. The Applicant in response addressed all of the Division's adequacy issues to the <br />Division's satisfaction. As a result, on February 24, 2017, the Division determined that the <br />application satisfies the requirements of Section 34-32.5-115(4) C.R.S. and issued its <br />recommendation to the Board to approve the application. <br />Issues Raised by the Objecting Party <br />In these proceedings, the Division's jurisdiction is limited to enforcement of the specific <br />requirements of the Act and Rules. The Division considers all timely submitted comments in its <br />review, but can address only the issues that directly relate to the specific requirements of an <br />application as stated in the Act and Rules. <br />The issues raised by the objecting party are represented by italic bold font. The Division's <br />response follows in standard font. In consideration of the application and objections, the <br />Division's jurisdiction is limited to enforcement of the specific requirements of the Act and <br />Rules. The Division considered all timely submitted comments in its review, but can address <br />only the issues that directly relate to the specific requirements of an application as stated in the <br />Act and Rules. <br />1. Concerns for devaluation of nearby property. Concerns regarding hours of operation, <br />noise pollution, sight pollution, and quality of life. <br />The Act and Rules do not specifically address issues of zoning and land use, impacts to visually <br />appealing landscapes, hours and/or days of operation, noise and sight pollution, and quality of <br />life. Such issues are typically addressed at the local government level and not at the State <br />Page 2of4 <br />