My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-03_REVISION - C1980004 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2017-02-03_REVISION - C1980004 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2017 6:42:45 AM
Creation date
2/8/2017 12:49:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/3/2017
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
McClane Canyon Mining, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR2
Email Name
ZTT
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
annual report will also include baseline water quality data in addition to the quarterly <br />monitoring data to allow for comparison of baseline and "during mining" conditions. <br />The annual report for the previous water year will be submitted no later than March <br />31 of each year. <br />E. Probable Hydrologic Consequences <br />A determination of the probable hydrologic consequences (PHC) of the mining and <br />reclamation activities at the McClane Canyon Mine site has been made by the <br />applicant and is found in Section 2.4.2.1 and Appendix N of the permit application. <br />Annual PHC updates are included in the annual hydrology report submitted each year <br />by the operator. <br />The Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of this document is divided into two <br />main subsections: Ground Water Effects and Surface Water Effects. <br />Ground Water Effects <br />The occurrence of ground water within and adjacent to the permit area is controlled <br />primarily by the combination of local topography, stratigraphy and geologic structure. <br />Drilling has indicated that the Cameo coal seam becomes increasingly saturated <br />downdip (northeast) from its outcrop along the side slopes of the East Salt Creek <br />Drainage basin. This is depicted on Figure 4.2-3, of Volume II of the permit <br />application. The saturated zone extends downdip towards the northeast along a <br />northwest -southeast trending line. The outcrop line of the coal, as well as the East Salt <br />Creek drainage, run roughly north -south in the vicinity of the permit area. Recharge <br />to the Cameo coal seam occurs in an area where the coal seam subcrops in the East <br />Salt Creek alluvium approximately two miles north of the McClave Canyon Mine <br />permit area. Very little recharge of the coal seams and sandstones occur along <br />outcrops due to the low precipitation and steep slopes which favor runoff over <br />infiltration. The underground workings extend roughly eastward into the Cameo seam <br />from a point where the coal seam outcrops in McClane Canyon. <br />Drilling in the vicinity of the portals has indicated that saturated sandstone strata are <br />about 210 feetbelow the Cameo seam, and therefore, beyond any likely impact caused <br />by the mining activities. Associated roof and floor strata are not saturated in the area <br />of the mine. The mined zone is not a recharge area for these strata. The initial mine <br />workings were situated within a geologic structure identified as a graben. This graben <br />is bounded on both sides by faults. Future mining will be primarily to the east of the <br />graben in an area south of the existing mine entries. <br />At the time of the initial permanent regulatory permit approval during the first quarter <br />of 1982, no water was discharged from the mine workings. However, subsequent to <br />the extension of the east mains to the east fault and north mains down dip to the <br />northeast in a parallel line with the east fault, mine inflows increased gradually and <br />required periodic discharge in accordance with an approved CDPS discharge permit <br />(002). Mine inflows peaked at a rate of approximately 5.4 gpm shortly after the mine <br />was idled in 1983, and steadily decreased until operations resumed in 1988. When <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.