My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-12-19_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-12-19_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2016 11:28:00 AM
Creation date
12/22/2016 11:12:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/19/2016
Doc Name
Responses to DRMS ECOSA Stability Review Comments
From
Newmont / CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM11
Email Name
TC1
AME
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br />was mined. This suggests the ECM / Altman backfill will not exceed an <br />elevation of somewhere in the range of 10,450 and 10,600 feet (amsl). <br /> <br />Response: Amendments 9 and 10 contained language indicating Altman backfill <br />was planned to approximately 10,600 feet (amsl) and that actual backfill may <br />vary according to economic and mining conditions. The Altman backfill elevation <br />was built to approximately 10,730 (amsl) which does not include a top soil <br />stockpile. The current ECOSA will blend together with the as-built Altman <br />backfill to make one ECOSA facility. As demonstrated in Drawing C-4 and as <br />discussed at the meeting between DRMS and CC&V held on November 9, 2016 <br />the proposed final mining elevation of ECOSA facility is planned for 10,960 feet <br />(amsl). An updated copy of Drawing C-4 is provided in Attachment 1. <br /> <br />c. Section 12.4.2 Overburden Storage Areas. On page 12-9, fourth paragraph there <br />is a statement that the height of the ECOSA will increase from that approved <br />in Amendment 10 to 10,960 feet (amsl). This elevation is between 360 and 510 <br />feet above what would be expected between those statements in comments N3.a <br />and b above. <br /> <br />Response: CC&V proposes to raise the height of the ECOSA from the 10,565 feet <br />(amsl) to 10,960 feet (amsl) elevation. CC&V has surveyed the backfill material <br />elevation from 10,600 (amsl) and plans to build to the final proposed ECOSA <br />facility elevation of approximately 10,960 (amsl). This is 360 feet higher than <br />proposed in Amendments 9 and 10. A revised geotechnical slope stability <br />analysis, in Attachment 2, was completed to ensure stability of the proposed final <br />ECOSA elevation to 10,960 (amsl). <br /> <br />Volume III, Appendix 6 – Technical Memorandum <br />N4. Stability Analyses Height Discrepancies. Figure elevations: Figure 2 indicates the <br />maximum elevation of the ECOSA is 10,900 feet (compared to the 10,960 <br />stated in Section 12.4.2). Figures 3, 4, and 5 suggest the crest elevation is <br />10,950 feet. The Attachment A stability model sections suggest a maximum <br />elevation of 10,950 feet as well. Please confirm the analyses were performed for <br />the 10,960 foot elevation stated in Section 12.4.2, or resubmit these analyses. <br /> <br />Response: The “East Cresson Overburden Storage Area Stability Review/Update <br />for Amendment No. 11 Permitting Submittal” in Attachment 2 contains Figure 1 <br />which was intended to show the location of the cross-sections in plan view. <br />Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5 are cross-sections displaying the correct final height of the <br />ECOSA at 10,960 feet (amsl). As seen in Attachment 2, page 6, CC&V confirms <br />the updated analysis was completed to the 10,960 feet (amsl) elevation. The <br />updated geotechnical slope stability report, to construct the ECOSA to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.