My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-12-19_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-12-19_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2016 11:28:00 AM
Creation date
12/22/2016 11:12:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/19/2016
Doc Name
Responses to DRMS ECOSA Stability Review Comments
From
Newmont / CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM11
Email Name
TC1
AME
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />6.4.3 Exhibit C – Pre mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands <br />N1. Drawing C-4. Contour elevation labels are missing on Drawing C-4 that would <br />confirm elevations discussed in the narrative portions of the application. <br />Please include appropriate contour elevation labels to determine elevations <br />from this drawing. <br /> <br />Response: CC&V updated Drawing C-4 to include contour elevation labels and is <br />included in Attachment 1. <br /> <br />6.4.5 Exhibit F – Reclamation Plan Map <br />N2. Drawing F-1. Contour elevation labels are missing on Drawing F-1 that would <br />confirm elevations discussed in the narrative portions of the application. Please <br />include appropriate contour elevation labels to determine elevations from this <br />drawing. <br /> <br />Response: CC&V updated Drawing F-1 to include contour elevation labels as well <br />as other modifications requested in Adequacy Comments received by the Division <br />dated October 19, 2016. An updated drawing F-1 was submitted to the Division as <br />Attachment 1 to Follow-up Adequacy Responses Dated December 16, 2016. <br /> <br />6.4.21 Exhibit U – Designated Mining Operation Environmental Protection Plan <br />N3. Height Discrepancy. The following discrepancies need to be resolved to the <br />Division’s satisfaction: <br />a. Section 4.2 Topography and Elevation. On page 4-1, last paragraph there is <br />a statement that the maximum (natural) elevation of the project is at the crest <br />of the hill east of the East Cresson Mine (ECM) area which is approximately <br />10,450 feet (amsl). <br /> <br />Response: Upon further review, the maximum (natural) elevation of the project is <br />the top of Bull Hill, located between the Main Cresson Pit and the ECOSA, which <br />is approximately 10,810 feet (amsl) and as shown in Drawing C-4. Bull Cliffs is <br />the next highest maximum (natural) elevation, immediately southeast of the East <br />Cresson Backfill (aka Altman Backfill), which is approximately 10,740 feet (amsl). <br />A copy of revised Drawing C-4 is provided in Attachment 1. <br /> <br />b. Section 5.6 Overburden Handling and Control. Page 5-17, at the end of second <br />paragraph, it is stated “Upon completion, the reclaimed ECOSA will blend <br />with backfilled portions of the East Cresson Mine areas.” The Division notes <br />that based on the USGS quadrangle map for the area, the elevation northwest of <br />the peak ranged roughly between 10,500 and 10,600 feet (amsl) before this area
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.