My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-10-21_REPORT - M1980244 (31)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-10-21_REPORT - M1980244 (31)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2017 10:52:55 AM
Creation date
12/22/2016 8:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/21/2016
Doc Name
SGVLF Phase I Cert Report - 0 Completion Report
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR87
Email Name
TC1
AME
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 1 Completion <br />Record of Construction Report <br />475.0106.006 <br />October 14, 2016 <br /> <br />P:\Projects\0106.006 CC&V CQA and EDS\J‐REPORTS\ROC Report\475.0106.006 CCV PHASE 1 ROC REPORT ‐ FINAL161014.DOCX <br /> Page 10 <br />3.2.1. Underdrain Fill <br />The Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 1 Completion area was constructed by placing 252 cy of UF. <br />The particle size distribution and atterberg limits testing frequencies were one sample <br />for every 5,000 cy. One UF sample was required to be tested for particle size and <br />atterberg limits. One UF sample was tested with passing results. UF laboratory testing is <br />summarized in Table 5 and individual test results are presented in Appendix H.1. <br />3.2.2. Select Structural Fill <br />The Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 1 Completion area was constructed by placing 63 cy of SSF. <br />The particle size distribution and atterberg limits testing frequencies were one sample <br />for every 50,000 cy. One SSF sample was required to be tested for particle size <br />distribution and atterberg limits testing. One SSF sample was tested with passing results. <br />SSF laboratory testing is summarized in Table 6 and individual test results are presented <br />in Appendix H.2. <br />3.2.3. Structural Fill <br />The Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 1 Completion area was constructed by placing 1,955,187 cy <br />of SF. The particle size distribution and atterberg limits testing frequencies were one <br />sample for every 50,000 cy. Forty SF samples were required to be tested for particle size <br />and atterberg limits. Forty SF samples were tested with passing results. SF laboratory <br />testing is summarized in Table 7 and individual test results are presented in Appendix <br />H.3. <br />No laboratory compaction testing was performed on the SF placed within the Squaw <br />Gulch VLF Phase 1 Completion area, as all SF material contained more than 30 percent <br />retained on the ¾‐inch sieve. Density was achieved by placing the material in <br />accordance with the method compaction specification presented in Appendix D. <br />3.2.4. Leak Detection Fill <br />The Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 1 Completion area was constructed by placing 251 cy of <br />LDF. The particle size distribution and atterberg limits testing frequencies were one <br />sample for every 10,000 cy. One LDF sample was required to be tested for particle size <br />and atterberg limits. Two LDF samples were tested with passing results. LDF laboratory <br />testing is summarized in Table 8 and individual test results are presented in Appendix <br />H.4. <br />3.2.5. Soil Liner Fill <br />The Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 1 Completion area was constructed by placing 101,690 cy of <br />SLF. The particle size distribution, atterberg limits, laboratory compaction, and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.