My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-10-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2016-10-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2016 7:30:25 AM
Creation date
12/13/2016 7:52:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/3/2016
Doc Name
Performance Standards
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 4
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS <br />standard students statistical t-test comparison of the means. As allowed under the rules promulgated on <br />9/14/05, these comparisons may utilize one of three methods detailed under Rule 4.15.11 (2) [(a), (b) or <br />(c)]. Also as allowed by Rule 4.15.7 (4), either weighted -average or individual protocols will be followed <br />depending on the resulting community that evolves (see Section 4.15.7 above). For grassland testing the <br />weighted average approach (Rule 4.15.7 (4) (b)) will be utilized where reference area data and <br />revegetated area data are "weighted" (each combined into single values for comparison) based on the <br />proportional acreage of pre -mine communities within the disturbance area footprint. Testing will then <br />follow procedures detailed under Rule 4.15.11 (2) with preference being given first to subsection (a) <br />[direct comparison], second to subsection (c) [reverse -null testing], and third subsection (b) [classic t- <br />test]. <br />For "targeted" sagebrush steppe revegetation (targeting the land use subcomponent of wildlife habitat), <br />herbaceous cover will be considered adequate for final bond release if it is not less than 70%* of the <br />sagebrush reference area's herbaceous cover with a 90% statistical confidence utilizing a standard <br />students statistical t-test comparison of the means. If necessary, a reverse -null hypothesis testing <br />procedure may be utilized in accordance with procedures detailed in Rule 4.15.11 (2) (c). As allowed <br />under Rule 4.15.8 (3) (ii), relaxation of the herbaceous cover standard for areas targeting wildlife habitat <br />post -mining land uses is designed to compensate for revegetation techniques (prescribed ecological <br />reclamation approach) that must discourage grasses to encourage shrubs in the post-revegetated <br />community. For "evolved" sagebrush steppe revegetation, the grassland cover standard will be <br />maintained. <br />A higher percentage of herbaceous cover is not practical or desirable for the following reasons: <br />It is well documented that in mined -land reclamation the establishment of shrubs to reach bond <br />release levels has proven to be very difficult. Perhaps the most detrimental condition affecting <br />shrub establishment is the competition from herbaceous vegetation. At a minimum herbaceous <br />cover levels should be less than the premining condition. If the herbaceous levels to be obtained <br />were set higher than the premining condition, the ability to achieve bond release levels for shrubs <br />would be most adversely affected. Higher levels of herbaceous cover would adversely compete <br />against woody vegetation and hinder its successful establishment. <br />2. In mined -land reclamation it is important to have adequate herbaceous cover to provide for <br />erosion control. The reference areas for the Collom mining area indicate herbaceous cover values <br />of 62.75%, 51.00% and 51.85% for the mountain shrub, sagebrush and grassland references <br />respectively. <br />The period of highest potential erosion occurs in the springtime during snowmelt. At this time of <br />year, erosion control is provided almost exclusively by herbaceous vegetation. Erosion control by <br />shrub cover is virtually insignificant since the potential erosion occurs from snowmelt rather than <br />raindrop impact. Therefore, if pre -mining levels of herbaceous vegetative cover can be re- <br />established, logically a comparable level of erosion control will be achieved. <br />3. The ability to achieve adequate levels of herbaceous cover in the Collom mining area is, without <br />question, quite possible. The vegetative monitoring completed at Colowyo during the last three <br />*The value of 70% has been selected given the following rationale: 1) herbaceous competition must be significantly restricted to <br />facilitate emergence and growth of shrubs as indicated under Rule 4.15.11 (3) (ii); 2) the original value is 90%; 3) a value of 50% <br />seems too low to adequately control erosion; 4) by regulation (4.15.11 (3)(a)) a reduction to 70% is allowed for one of the <br />demonstrations for revegetation success for woody plant density; and 5) 70% of the herbaceous material in a native reference <br />area should be adequate to control erosion on slopes 10% or less. <br />Collom — Rule 4, Page 22 Revision Date: 4/18/16 <br />Revision No.: PR -04 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.