My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-11-29_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2016-11-29_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2016 12:57:17 PM
Creation date
12/1/2016 12:55:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/29/2016
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining, Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
TNL
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Revegetation Success Sampling and Results <br />TMI sampled vegetation in the summer of 2014 and the summer of 2015. The Operator hired IME <br />consulting firm from Yampa, Colorado to assess the revegetation success. Two bond release blocks were <br />sampled. One bond release block consisted of parcels reclaimed in the D, F, and Z pits that are within <br />range site A and B. The second bond release block consists of parcels reclaimed in the A, D, and H pits <br />that are within range site C. The bond release blocks were sampled for vegetative cover, productivity, <br />species diversity, woody plant density and shrub clump survival. The range site A/B bond release block <br />was compared to the approved success standard for range site A and the range site C bond release block <br />was compared to the revegetation success standards for Range Site C as approved in section 4.4 of TMI's <br />permit. Trapper achieved vegetative success for rangeland cover, productivity, diversity, woody plant <br />density and shrub clump survival. Due to non -parametric data distribution of rangeland productivity and <br />woody plant density data, TMI demonstrated reclamation success of these two parameters by using the <br />reverse null hypothesis per rule 4.15.11(2)(c). <br />Two revegetation monitoring reports were submitted with the SL -17 application for areas sampled in 2014 <br />and 2015. These reports outline the methods used to measure vegetative cover, productivity, species <br />diversity, and woody plant density/shrub clump survival. The sampling methods used meet the criteria <br />outlined in Rule 4.15.1 1(1) and the permit application. Revegetation monitoring transects were randomly <br />located throughout the bond release blocks. Each portion of the bond release block had an equal chance <br />of being sampled. Plant cover was measured along a minimum of twenty 50 meter transects. Ten locations <br />along each transect were sampled using a metal 10 -point frame resulting in 100 data points collected per <br />transect. Plant cover data were used to measure and evaluate species diversity. To measure production, a <br />minimum of thirty transects were sampled. Three randomly -located, one -quarter -meter clip plots were <br />sampled along each transect. The plots were clipped by life forms of perennial grasses and perennial <br />forbs. Annuals, biennials, noxious weeds and shrub production were not clipped. Following clipping, the <br />harvested plant material was oven -dried and weighed to determine average production for the bond release <br />blocks. Modified belt transects were conducted along the same thirty transects used to measure production <br />to determine woody plant density for the range site A/B block. Also, two shrub clumps were located <br />within the range site A/B bond release block. Each shrub clump contains 250 to 300 shrub pads. Half of <br />each of the shrub pads was counted to quantify that at least 50% of the pads contained 10 living woody <br />plant stems per pad. <br />For range site A, the required herbaceous cover standard is 33% and 19% litter cover for a total 52% <br />effective cover ("Allowable Cover"). For range site B, the required herbaceous cover standard is 29% <br />and 23% litter cover for a total effective cover of 52%. For range site C, the required herbaceous cover <br />standard is 25% and 22.0% litter cover for a total effective cover of 47%. These standards for each of the <br />range sites are listed on Table 4.4-1 of the permit. For this release (SL -17), since the range site A/B bond <br />release block consists of range site A and B types, the revegetation standard for range site A was used to <br />evaluate revegetation success since it has the most conservative standard. <br />According to the revegetation monitoring reports, the range site A/B block in 2014 had a total allowable <br />cover average of 80.45% and a perennial plant cover average of 56.9%. For the 2014 data, perennial <br />grasses Great Basin Wildrye (Elymus cinereus), Western Wheatgrass (Agropyron smithii), Kentucky <br />Bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and Sheep Fescue (Festuca ovina) dominated the seeded vegetation on the <br />Trapper Mine Page 8 November, 2016 <br />Phase III Bond Release (SL -17) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.