Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENT, INC. PAGE 2 <br /> SEPTEMBER 1 , 201 6 <br /> ronment, Solid Waste Division, they confirmed that a CD would <br /> be required. L.G. Everist, Inc . will obtain a CD, as de- <br /> scribed in the MOU provided, prior to filing the Technical <br /> Revision to implement the Inert Fill alternate plan. <br /> EXHIBIT G -Water Information (Rule 6.4.7): <br /> This site will employ compacted clay liners to satisfy SEO requirements. These liners, in conjunction with <br /> site dewatering prior to liner placement, may result in groundwater mounding or shadowing issues, <br /> therefore, a groundwater level monitoring and mitigation plan will be required for this site. Please submit a <br /> plan for DRMS approval that illustrates, at a minimum, groundwater level monitoring points, level <br /> measuring method, frequency and reporting, as well as impact mitigation trigger levels and proposed <br /> mitigation options. <br /> Attached is a Groundwater Monitoring and Mitigation Plan describ- <br /> ing the items you requested. We are in the process of locating <br /> and installing 4 Piezometers around the south, west and north <br /> sides of Area C. There are 3 lined reservoirs in the near <br /> vicinity of the mine, 2 along County Road 26 and 1 east of the <br /> mining area. Also attached is a new map, Map Exhibit G-2 showing <br /> the proposed locations of the Piezometers . <br /> According to the maps submitted with the application, a portion of the site along the north permit boundary <br /> is within the 100 year flood plain. The application as submitted does not address how the permittee will <br /> prevent damage to the lined reservoirs from flood events to ensure long term stability of the site- please <br /> address. Many operators incorporate engineered inlet/outlet structures to lined reservoirs to allow flood <br /> flows to enter and exit the reservoir in a controlled fashion. These structures are intended to prevent <br /> damage to the clay liners and prevent possible head-cutting damage due to flood events. <br /> The location of the 100-year flood plain shown on the maps was <br /> from an old version of the FEMA FIRM map for this area. A <br /> revised FIRM map was issued in January 2016 and it shows the <br /> 100-year flood plain is no longer on the property. I have <br /> attached a Firmette showing the permit area (found at <br /> http://fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=49069b9l cl4a411 fa8defccf5c1 f6266) <br /> I added the Affected Lands line to the map for reference . <br /> Since the reservoirs are not in the flood plain we prefer not <br /> to include spillways for them. I have enclosed copies of <br /> revised Map Exhibit C, C-1, E & F with the flood plain re- <br /> moved. <br /> EXHIBIT L - Reclamation Costs (Rule 6.4.12): (1)All information necessary to calculate the costs of reclamation <br /> must be submitted and broken down into the various major phases of reclamation. You must provide <br /> sufficient information to calculate the cost of reclamation that would be incurred by the state. DRMS will <br /> recalculate reclamation costs when all adequacy issues are resolved. Based on conditions observed <br /> during pre-op inspection, a significant amount of clean-up, lining and re-sloping work remains to be <br /> completed in Area B. The remainder of Area A will need to be backfilled to approximate original grade. <br /> Estimates for these tasks, broken down by task, and including information such as material quantities <br /> required, push distances, equipment utilized, etc. should be provided in this Exhibit. <br /> Exhibit L contains all of the information noted. The minor <br /> revisions we made during this response do not affect the overall <br /> numbers provided. <br />