My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-09-26_REVISION - M2004031 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2004031
>
2016-09-26_REVISION - M2004031 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:33:23 PM
Creation date
9/28/2016 3:20:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004031
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/26/2016
Doc Name
Recommendation to Approve Amendment with Objections
From
DRMS
To
Aggregate Industries
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rationale for Recommendation to Approve <br />Page 15 <br />September 26, 2016 <br />groundwater Ievels in MW -3 and MW 11 B and within 0.54 feet of the pre -slurry wall average <br />groundwater elevation in MW -2. <br />In the TR to AM -01, submitted to the Division on September I, 2016, the Operator committed to <br />submitting to the Division within 60 days of completion of the permanent groundwater <br />mitigation plan, a follow-up certification created by a qualified engineer certifying that the <br />permanent plan was constructed in accordance with the plans, compaction requirements and <br />specifications approved through AM -01. <br />Therefore, the revised AM -01 demonstrates compliance with the requirements of Section 34- <br />32.5-116(4)(h) C.R.S., and Rule 3.1.6(I), whereby disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic <br />balance must be minimized. <br />4. Concerns that additional US Army Corps ofEngilteeis (USACOE) 404 permitting <br />requirements are weeded prior to approval ofAM-01 and implementation of the <br />proposed corrective action. (Equity Funding LLC - second comntent period) <br />The Objector did not provide any documentation to support the assertion regarding jurisdictional <br />wetlands being inadvertently created by the recent installation of the slurry wall. Regardless, the <br />Operator is subject to USACOE permitting and reporting requirements for this operation, and is <br />required to maintain compliance with the conditions of the existing 404 permit. As such, the <br />Objector should direct such concerns to the USACOE. <br />The Act and Rules do not require the attainment of all other permits prior to the approval of the <br />Division's reclamation permit. Pursuant to Rules 1.4.9 and 1.4.13(1), the Office was mandated <br />to render a recommendation on the application on September 26, 2016, and did so in accordance <br />with the Act and Rules. <br />5. Groundwater should be the foots of the antendment application (Equity Funding <br />LLC — second comment period) <br />The first three sentences of the TetraTech TR Memo dated August 24 2016, and also provided <br />with the Equity Funding comment letter dated September 21, 2016 state: "This memorandum <br />documents the design basis of the Orr water drain and the reservoir outlet at the Hazeltine Mine. <br />This system will be constructed to address an Order from the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board. The purpose of the drain is to mitigate elevated groundivater• resulting f-onr the slurry <br />wall surrounding the Hazeltine Mine on the Orr Property." (emphasis added) <br />6. Conurrerrts regarding requirement for ground►vater Level nronitor-irtg outside of <br />permit area utilizing additional new wells on Orr property with increased frequency <br />and reporting requirements. (Equity Funding LLC— second cominentperiod) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.