My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-09-26_REVISION - M2004031 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2004031
>
2016-09-26_REVISION - M2004031 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:33:23 PM
Creation date
9/28/2016 3:20:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004031
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/26/2016
Doc Name
Recommendation to Approve Amendment with Objections
From
DRMS
To
Aggregate Industries
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rationale for Recommendation to Approve <br />Page 14 <br />September 26, 2016 <br />for approval of AM -01, received January 13, 2016, and September 20, 2016. DWR's conditions <br />for approval included requirements for accounting of all inflow and outflow as necessary to <br />demonstrate compliance with Colorado water allocation laws, and requirements to perform a <br />final leak test, after installation of the drain pipes, to verify the integrity of the slurry wall. <br />In a correspondence dated June 21, 2016, the Operator affirmatively stated operations were in <br />compliance and will remain in compliance with DWR requirements. <br />With respect to the second SEO comment expressing concern for the integrity of the approved <br />slurry wall after the proposed drain installation, it is standard practice for the Division to notice <br />the DWR prior to permit release for any lined reservoir. DWR will have an opportunity to object <br />to the release of the permit if they feel that liner integrity issues have not been fully addressed to <br />their satisfaction at that time. <br />Therefore, AM -0I demonstrates compliance with the applicable requirements of Section 34- <br />32.5-116(4)(h) C.R.S., and Rule 3.1.6(I)(a). <br />3. Concerns that the permanentground►vater mounding mitigation plait as proposed <br />will not sufficiently redttcegrorrtrdwater mounding and impacts to off-sitepropetty. <br />(Equity Funding LLC— first and second commentperiods) <br />Pursuant to Section 34-32.5-116(4)(h) C.R.S., and Rule 3.1.6(1), the Operator must demonstrate <br />how the mining and reclamation activities will be conducted to minimize disturbances to the <br />prevailing hydrologic balance of the affected land and of the surrounding area and to the quantity <br />and quality of water in surface and groundwater systems. <br />In the February 29, 2016, adequacy letter to the Operator, the Division identified the average pre - <br />slurry wall groundwater elevations for three monitoring wells up -gradient of the slurry wall and <br />proximal to the location of the permanent groundwater mitigation plan activity (MW -2, MW -3, <br />and MW -11 B). These average pre -slurry wall groundwater elevations were calculated from the <br />monthly groundwater level monitoring data collected by the Operator from February 2004 until <br />the slurry wall was completed in June of 2005. <br />Based on this data, prior to the installation of the slurry wall at the site, the average groundwater <br />elevation for monitoring well MW -2 was 5035.96 feet (5.63 feet below ground surface); well <br />MW -3 was 5037.69 feet (10.58 feet below ground surface); and well MW -I IB was 5036.90 feet <br />(2.63 feet below ground surface). The amendment proposes setting the invert (inlet) elevation of <br />the Orr drain (located adjacent to MW -2) at an elevation of 5036.5 feet. This elevation is an <br />additional 2.3 feet below the elevation of the current temporary drain, and is intended to lower <br />groundwater levels in the area to approximate pre -slurry wall levels while still allowing for <br />positive drainage into the completed reservoir at its design high water elevation of 5036.0 feet. <br />The proposed Orr drain invert elevation (5036.5 feet) is below the average pre -mining <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.