Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Roger Schmidt <br /> September 2, 2016 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Table 2. Flow Velocities at F Street Agricultural Field. <br /> Field Channel Flow Rate Flow Depth Velocity <br /> Condition geometry (cfs) (ft)' (ft/sec)' <br /> Pre-mining Slope: 0.004 ft/ft 50 0.49 1.0 <br /> Bottom width: 15 ft <br /> L. bank: 300:1 <br /> R. bank: 60:1 <br /> 300 1.0 1.5 <br /> Post-mining Slope: 0.33 ft/ft 50 0.24 2.8 <br /> Bottom Width: 75 <br /> L. bank: 1:1 <br /> R. bank: 1:1 <br /> 300 0.79 5. 7771 <br /> Note: 1) Flow depths and velocities are based on the normal flow depth for the pre-mining condition with flow across <br /> the field and for the post-mining condition for critical flow depth with flow down the 3:1 slope of the pit excavation. <br /> The lower velocities in the flows across the field in the pre-mining condition (e.g., approximately <br /> 1.5 feet per second for 300 cfs) would not be expected to erode the silt, sands and lean clay <br /> materials at the site identified in the Geotechnical Engineering Report for the Boyd/Freeman <br /> Ditch Repair(Olsson Associates, 2014), particularly when the river's flood flows are expected to <br /> be transporting colloidal silts. In contrast, the higher velocities in the post-mining, or headcut- <br /> forming condition, (e.g., roughly 5 feet per second at 300 cfs) could be expected, given a <br /> reasonable degree of engineering certainty, to exceed the permissible velocities for those <br /> materials (Chow, 1959)and thereby cause erosion, leading to formation of a headcut. <br /> An additional consideration regarding channel hydraulics in the area of interest is the bridge <br /> owned by the Great Western Railroad which spans the Cache La Poudre River immediately <br /> northwest of the F Street agricultural field. The bridge has numerous piers in the river and <br /> observation of the bridge on June 22, 2015 revealed a substantial volume of aggraded gravel and <br /> sediment upstream of the bridge (see Appendix A, Photo A.22). The deposited material <br /> upstream of the bridge indicates slowing of water velocity as the river passes the bridge piers, <br /> which would result in a backwater condition upstream from the bridge during high flows. The <br /> backwater upstream from the railroad bridge is shown in the most recent FEMA floodplain <br /> mapping(Figure 3a). <br /> GRAVEL PIT PERMITTING <br /> Review of documents shows that the Al Pit was developed with permits obtained through and <br /> approved by Weld County and the Colorado Division of Reclamation and Mining Safety <br /> (DRMS) and its predecessor agencies. Documents reviewed also show approved DRMS <br /> permitting for the Iverson/Martin Marietta Pit. <br />