My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-08-02_INSPECTION - C1992081
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1992081
>
2016-08-02_INSPECTION - C1992081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:25:24 PM
Creation date
8/3/2016 7:03:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
8/2/2016
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Hayden Gulch Terminal, LLC
Inspection Date
7/26/2016
Email Name
JHB
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 26, 2016 C-1992-081/Hayden Gulch Loadout JHB <br />Inspection Topic Summary <br />NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br />R - Air Resource Protection <br />N - Availability of Records <br />R - Backfill & Grading <br />NA - Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste <br />NA - Explosives <br />N - Fish & Wildlife <br />R - Hydrologic Balance <br />Y - Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan <br />NA - Other <br />NA - Processing Waste <br />R - Roads <br />R - Reclamation Success <br />Y - Revegetation <br />NA - Subsidence <br />N - Slides and Other Damage <br />N - Support Facilities On-site <br />Y - Signs and Markers <br />NA - Support Facilities Not On-site <br />NA - Special Categories Of Mining <br />N -Topsoil <br />COMMENTS <br />This was a partial inspection conducted by Janet Binns of CDRMS. No HGT personnel were on the site at the <br />time of inspection. HGT has contractors on site conducting demolition of the rail line. The weather was cloudy <br />with a thunderstorm moving in during the inspection. <br />AIR RESOURCE PROTECTION — Rule 4.17: <br />During the inspection a quick thunderstorm blew into the area. Recently disturbed areas adjacent to the <br />rail line where the demolition work is occurring was subject to blowing dust. The disturbance consists of surface <br />travel of equipment along the east side of the rail bed, and a lay down and storage area east of the rail line and <br />Routt County road No. 37. The soil appears to be very fine grained. Strong winds produced a dust cloud that <br />obscured visibility on RCR #37 for a brief time. Soil stabilization measures are needed on the fresh disturbance <br />areas. Water spray or another means to address dust suppression is needed. <br />BACKFILL and GRADING — Rule 4.14 <br />Contemporaneous Reclamation 4.14.1; Approximate Original Contour 4.14.2; Highwall Elimination 4.14.1(2)(f); <br />Steep Slopes 4.14.2, 4.27; Handling of Acid and Toxic Materials 4.14.3; Stabilization of Rills and Gullies 4.14.6: <br />HGT is in the process or removing the rail, ties, spikes and other metal components of the rail, and the <br />rock ballast. Demolition began where RCR #37 crosses the rail line on the east side of the rail loop area. The <br />inspector spoke with one of the contractors running the bobcat. He said they had been working for two weeks. <br />That had progressed approximately 3000 feet to the south of the road crossing, (Exhibit 12-1 used for estimate). <br />Access to the laydown and storage area was through an existing road way off the county road. <br />During the inspection, a grazing leaseholder for the area east of the rail line and west of RCR # 37 stopped by. <br />Mrs. Linda Sines (unsure of proper spelling) wanted to be assured that the fences would be reinstalled once work <br />is complete. She requested updates on time frame of work in order to know when she could utilize her lease. I <br />provided Mrs. Sines with Jerry Nettleton's phone number, as well as the Division's phone number, and my contact <br />information. I informed her that the mine identification signs also have the contact information. <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 1 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 0 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.