My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-28_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-07-28_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 10:46:27 PM
Creation date
8/1/2016 12:01:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/28/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VOLUME II OF IV <br /> HYDROGEOCHEMISTRY EVALUATION/DECEMBER 15,2015/ADRIAN BROWN <br /> 3.4.1 Ground Water Flow <br /> • Page 7: The first sentence mentions "three principal historic drainage tunnels"and <br /> refers to Plate 4—Diatreme. However, Plate 4 only shows the Carlton Tunnel. If <br /> the other two drainage tunnels were meant to be shown on Plate 4(as <br /> indicated), please revise Plate 4 to show all three tunnels. <br /> RESPONSE. A revised Plate 4 is included in Attachment 1. The two other <br /> drainage tunnels, the Moffat Tunnel and the Roosevelt Tunnel are described in <br /> Section 3.4.1, items 1 and 2. Flows from both of these tunnels essentially ceased <br /> when the Carlton Tunnel became operational. The groundwater model is not <br /> influenced by either the Moffat or the Roosevelt Tunnel, so they were not depicted <br /> on Plate 4. A revised Plate 4 is provided in Attachment I with the Moffat and <br /> Roosevelt Tunnels for reference purposes only. In adding these tunnels, additional <br /> research indicates that the description of the tunnels in the report is partially <br /> incorrect, conflating the Moffatt Tunnel with the El Paso Tunnel, and is <br /> incomplete, omitting the Standard Tunnel. The initial portion of the text in Section <br /> 3.4.1 should read as follows and the revised Plate 4 should be substituted, showing <br /> the locations of the relevant tunnels. <br /> Revised Text for Hydrogeochemistry Evaluation Report: <br /> 3.4.1 Ground Water Flow <br /> Ground water flow in the District has been collected and removed from the Diatreme <br /> since 1903 by a number of principal historic drainage tunnels (Plate 4—Diatreme): <br /> 1. Moffat Tunnel. The Moffat Tunnel(also known as the Ophelia Tunnel) enters the <br /> granite at the west base of Gold Hill at an elevation of 9,268 feet. In December, 1896, <br /> this tunnel was 2,600 feet in length, with a discharge estimated at from 2,000 to 2,100 <br /> gallons a minute. The tunnel maintained this flow for over a year, becoming dry in 1898 <br /> (Lindgren and Ransome, 1906) <br /> 2. Standard Tunnel. The Standard tunnel, begun in January, 1896, has its portal in the <br /> granite west of Beacon Hill, at an elevation of 9,027 feet. Its objective was the phonolite <br /> plug of Beacon Hill[southwest of the main diatreme]. In February, 1896, the tunnel cut <br /> the El Paso vein, whence issued a flow of 250 gallons a minute. The water became more <br /> abundant as the contact between the granite and phonolite was approached, and in <br /> 1898, when the phonolite was reached, the flow amounted to 1,000 gallons a minute. <br /> This rapidly increased as the tunnel penetrated the phonolite and in 1899 the maximum <br /> flow of from 12,000 to 18,000 gallons a minute was attained. Work was finally <br /> abandoned in June, 1899, when the tunnel had been driven 2,800 feet. By the end of <br /> 1901 the tunnel was dry(Lindgren and Ransome, 1906). <br /> 3. El Paso Tunnel. The El Paso Tunnel was driven in 1903 from a portal elevation of <br /> 8,783 feet from the south of the city of Cripple Creek to the north-east, and is <br /> approximately one mile long. Flow from the tunnel was initially as much as 7,000 gpm, <br /> reducing to less than 2,000 gpm by 1906 Flow from the tunnel ceased when tunnels at <br /> lower elevations reduced the water level in the Diatreme below the elevation of the <br /> tunnel.As was the case with the Standard tunnel, the El Paso slowly lowered the <br /> water in the Mary McKinney and Elkton mines, showing that there is a connection <br /> through open fissures between the Beacon Hill phonolite and the main volcanic neck <br /> (Lindgren and Ransome, 1906). <br /> 4. Roosevelt Tunnel. [no change] <br /> 5. Carlton Tunnel. [no change] <br /> Page 2 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.