My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-28_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-07-28_REVISION - M1980244 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 10:46:27 PM
Creation date
8/1/2016 12:01:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/28/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 —Summary and Conclusions <br /> • Page 34: The text states"the dewatering by the drainage tunnels has created widespread <br /> dry conditions in at least the upper 750 feet of the diatreme and the adjacent granites in <br /> portions of Grassy Valley." However, it was mentioned previously in the evaluation that <br /> the diatreme water table is located approximately 1,000-3,000 feet below the ground <br /> surface throughout most of the diatreme. In which portion(s)of the diatreme is the <br /> water table at 750 feet below surface? <br /> RESPONSE:See Hydrogeochemistry Report, Plate 11,for contoured depths to water. <br /> The specific answer to the question is along a zone in the Eastern Volcanic Overflow <br /> Apron. The comment in the text refers to the eruptive centers, and the areas where there <br /> has been underground mining, which do not in general include the apron, which has little <br /> gold mineralization. <br /> Table 2-1 Water Quality Monitoring Parameters <br /> • This Table provides a list of the water quality monitoring parameters that are used at least <br /> at all compliance sites according to this evaluation. Please also provide a list showing <br /> the established numeric protection levels that are used for all compliance monitoring <br /> sites(surface and groundwater). The Division understands that different values may <br /> be used for each drainage according to its classification; however,this information <br /> should be compiled here in AM-11. <br /> RESPONSE:Numeric protection levels for groundwater are provided in the table below <br /> for each of the drainages where compliance monitoring is required. <br /> Manganese, <br /> Sulfate, Dissolved Zinc, Weak Acid <br /> Total(mg/I (mg/I as Dissolved Dissociable <br /> Drainage as SO4) pH Mn) (mg/I as Zn) Cyanide,mg/I <br /> Aregua 1070 6 through 9 8.1 2 0.2 <br /> Grassy <br /> Valley 250 6.5 through 8.5 4 6.5 <br /> Vindicator 800 6.5 through 8.5 2 <br /> WCMW 3 250 6 through 9 0.5 2 0.2 <br /> WCMW 6 250 6.5 through 8.5 0.2 2 0.2 <br /> Figure 2-1 Surface Water and Groundwater Monitoring Locations <br /> • As mentioned previously, this figure does not appear to show all of the compliance <br /> monitoring sites mentioned in the text(9 surface water sites, 17 groundwater sites). Please <br /> revise this figure to include locations of all compliance sites. <br /> RESPONSE: Comment noted. A revised Figure 2-1, 2-la and 2-1 b are provided as <br /> Attachment 2. <br /> • Several non-compliance monitoring sites were also discussed in the text(and data <br /> provided in Figures 3-1 —3-6 and 4-1 —4-22); however,their locations are not shown on <br /> Page 23 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.