My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-21_REVISION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2016-07-21_REVISION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:25:02 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 7:18:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/21/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #2
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR115
Email Name
TNL
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TR -115 Response 2 Cont. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />parcel depicted on Map M1OB. Please review the topsoil stripping plan and replacement <br />plan depicted on the proposed M l OB map and reconcile it with what has occurred to date <br />and what Trapper plans in 2016 and 2017. <br />Trapper Response: see prior comments <br />DRMS Response: This item is being addressed under items 2 and 4 <br />4. Based on the item above, please review Table 3.1-3 on proposed revised page 3-13 and <br />make any necessary updates to the topsoil replacement balance for the permit term. <br />Trapper Response: Table 3.1-3 has been revised and included. <br />DRMS Response: Table 3.1-3 was discussed with Jared Ebert when additional discrepancies <br />were noted in the draft table, please update table as discussed. <br />Trapper Response: Tahle 3.1-3 has hecn revisal ag'aitl and is included, <br />4.1. Table 3.1-3 will need to be revised to show the projected reclamation in 2016 and <br />2017. It was agreed to by TMI and the Division that Table 3.1-3 should be revised to <br />show what reclamation was completed in 2013, 2014 and 2015 and to project what <br />will be backfilled and graded in 2016 and 2017. <br />Trapper Response: Scc ahove commcnt. <br />5. Please evaluate the topsoil balance for the KLM pit and demonstrate in detail if the cost <br />estimate shown on Table A-10.6 is still adequate. Or, if necessary, please update this <br />table with a new cost associated with topsoil replacement of the KLM pit. <br />Trapper's Response: TMI provided a demonstration that the number of acres originally <br />bonded, for in the KLM pit would need to be increased with the approval of TRI 15 and <br />provided an estimate of the additional acres to be bonded as well as cost estimate for the <br />activity. A copy of Table A-10.6 was provided in the cover letter but Trapper did not <br />submit an updated table for Appendix A. <br />DRMS Response: Jared Ebert reviewed Trappers calculation and have discussed it with Graham <br />Roberts with TMI. Trapper estimated 154 additional acres would need to be bonded for topsoil <br />replacement. Upon review of Trapper's estimate, I believe this is a conservative estimate that <br />makes up for the decreased amount of topsoil replacement in 2015 from what was projected. <br />Given this, the estimated the cost to re -apply topsoil to 154 acres will be $269,744.00. See the <br />attached CIRCES sheets for details. <br />5.1. Please submit a revised table A-10.6 and A-9.1 for Appendix A. <br />Trapper Response: .,Is per discussions n,ith Jared Eherl (C'DRM,S) on .hdv /X, 01 h <br />revisions of the Appendix :1 tables will have a negative ellect on the hacgrity of the tmrst <br />(AISC AY•c'1tc11•10 hoed calculations contained lrlthill .^lppeluhx A alld Scctioll 1.4 of the <br />Permit. 1n response, revisal tables A-1 U.6 cnul.4-9.1 1ri11 he ineltnlecl cr.ti' relerenre with <br />ttp��raclecl costs Io be attached cntd iltscrted frith thcTR-1 IS Rolxl Rrrision 7cthlc scctiun. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.