Laserfiche WebLink
Table 7. Summary of Proposed Road Improvement Phasing Schedule <br />Year <br />Phase <br />Improvements <br />Avg Daily <br />1 <br />Outgoing Trucks <br />Max Trucks on a <br />Single Day <br />2016 <br />1 <br />Temporary Pavement Adjacent to 2541 and <br />80 <br />96 <br />3230 CR 120 (McCue and Hunzeker) <br />Widening, Regrading and Paving from 2541 CR <br />2017 <br />2 <br />120 (McCue) through the Narrows (approx. 2 <br />80 <br />96 <br />miles) <br />2018 <br />None <br />100 <br />120 <br />2019 <br />3 <br />Re -Alignment, Construction, and Paving at 90 <br />100 <br />120 <br />degree corner (approx. 1,500 feet) <br />Reconstruction of existing pavement (approx. <br />2020 <br />4 <br />2.3 miles) and Widening, Regrading, and Paving <br />100 <br />120 <br />of Gravel Portion (approx. 2 miles) <br />2021 <br />Phase 4 completed and accepted <br />120 <br />144 <br />(1) Based on monthly average, with Sundays excluded <br />(2) Maximum Trucks based on 20% of single day allowance <br />Generally, GCC has not complied with their refusals such as: <br />1. GCC Energy stated verbally and in writing that they do not want to abide to a schedule with firm <br />dates for the improvements. <br />2. GCC stated they do not want to be limited to the long-term truck hauling volume and loading <br />threshold of 120 average/ 144 maximum haul trucks per day. <br />3. GCC stated they do not want to be limited to the short-term truck hauling volume and loading <br />threshold of 80 average/96 maximum haul trucks per day. <br />4. GCC stated they do not recognize the potential for an annual increase to a road maintenance fee <br />based upon a standard and reliable construction cost index. <br />An average of 120 (240 one-way trips)/144 maximum haul trucks/day is an "upper limit" of <br />recommended volume and loading tolerance to the applicant's chosen haul route (north CR 120); and <br />which still may be considered compatible to the rural residential, adjacent properties directly affected <br />with the proposed project. <br />GCC Energy has various options which also may be considered within their proposal, to expand <br />operations via a designated haul route not shared with public traffic, constructed as a private road, etc. <br />(which could be considered within a process for a land use permit). In fact, should GCC choose to <br />modify the timing of their ability to load more trucks upon north CR 120 than the considered, scheduled <br />phases provide, they would have the opportunity to accelerate their desired, heavier impacts by <br />completing any phase ahead of the predicted schedule. And, finally, should they realize that the <br />schedule is not appropriate any longer based upon unknown factors to them at this date, then they have <br />the opportunity to propose an amendment to an issued land use permit. <br />Project No. 2012-0089 PC <br />4852-5627-2942, v. 3 <br />Page 19 of 32 <br />(DM, VS, DP) <br />