Laserfiche WebLink
PERMIT#:M-1990-041 <br /> INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: MAC <br /> INSPECTION DATE: April 26,2016 <br /> complete inventory of all fuel, lubricants and chemicals which will be stored at the mine site. The inventory shall <br /> specify total volumes of materials to be stored, shall identify the various storage areas, and shall provide a plan <br /> of how the Operator will address clean-up of any spills of the stored materials. In addition, if fuel is to be stored, <br /> then the Technical Revision shall address the how the appropriate secondary containment will be constructed. <br /> Secondary containment areas must be able to contain 110% of the total volume of fuel to be stored. <br /> CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 6/10/16 <br /> OBSERVATIONS <br /> The inspection was conducted by Michael Cunningham of the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> (Division). The Operator did not have a representative present for the inspection. Matt Collins attended the <br /> inspection on behalf of George Otten, but did not represent Central City Consolidated Mining in a formal <br /> capacity. In addition, Kathy Rosow and Michelle DeLaria with the Colorado Department of Public Health and <br /> Environment, Water Quality Control Division attended the inspection. The Bates-Hunter Mine is located <br /> between the towns of Central City and Blackhawk alongside State Highway 279. The mine site occupies <br /> approximately 1 acre and is situated at an elevation of 8,300 ft. The Golden Gilpin Mill is located about a half <br /> a mile up Highway 119 from its intersection with State Highway 279. The mill facility occupies the remaining <br /> 2.5 acres of the 3.5 acre permit boundary. The post-mining land use is industrial/commercial. <br /> Availability Of Records: <br /> The Bates-Hunter Mine completed the first five year term of Temporary Cessation on March 8, 2016. The <br /> Operator did not submit a Notice for the second five year term of Temporary Cessation as outlined in Rule <br /> 1.13.5(3). Therefore, the permit was taken out of a Temporary Cessation status and placed back into Active <br /> status. The Division notified the Operator in writing of this change to the permit status on March 31, 2016. <br /> Pursuant to Rule 1.13.1(1), a permit granted pursuant to these Rules shall continue in effect as long as an <br /> Operator continues to engage in the extraction of minerals and/or the mining operation complies with the <br /> provisions of the Act. Therefore, the Operator shall resume active mining operations at the Bates-Hunter <br /> Mine. If active mining operations will not resume, then the Operator shall commence with reclamation of the <br /> site. Pursuant to Rule 3.1.3(2), all reclamation shall be carried to completion by the Operator with all <br /> reasonable diligence, and each phase of reclamation shall be completed from within five years from the date <br /> the Operator informs the Board or Office that such phase has commenced. <br /> Acid And Toxic Materials: <br /> The Division observed three 55 gallon drums on the east side of the Hoist/Office Building; two unlabeled steel <br /> drums and one plastic drum with a Ferric Chloride label. The contents of one of the steel drums had <br /> overtopped the container and spread from the concrete pad to the ground. The lid of the second drum was <br /> bulged outward, indicating the drum was potentially pressurized. The Division did not move any of the drums <br /> or remove lids; all observations were visual. <br /> The Division observed a fuel containment area on the east side of the Water Treatment Building. The <br /> secondary containment for the fuel consists of an earthen impoundment with a liner. The liner was not <br /> anchored and did not appear to provide complete coverage over the impoundment. Two fuel racks were <br /> located within the fuel containment area. The fuel racks contained six 55 gallon steel drums and one larger <br /> steel drum. The drums were not labeled. In addition, the Division observed numerous plastic gas cans around <br /> the perimeter of the earthen impoundment.The secondary containment was at full capacity at the time of the <br /> inspection and had overtopped the impoundment in several areas as evidenced by the staining of soil around <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />