Laserfiche WebLink
PERMIT #: M-2007-006 <br />INSPECTOR’S INITIALS: TOD <br />INSPECTION DATE: January 14, 2016 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br /> <br />This normal routine monitoring inspection was conducted by Tyler O’Donnell of the Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety (Division). Fremont Paving and Redi-Mix, Inc. (Operator), was represented by John Paul Ary <br />and Chris Robinette during the inspection. <br /> <br />The Ted Franciscotti Pit No.1 is located in Huerfano County approximately 10 miles northwest of Walsenburg, <br />Colorado. The Ted Franciscotti Pit No.1 is a 282-acre 112c Construction Materials Reclamation Permit with a <br />maximum allowed disturbance of 25 acres. The maximum allowed disturbance of 25 acres was a conditional <br />approval of the permit. The primary commodity being mined at the site is sand and gravel. The 112c Construction <br />Materials Reclamation Permit was issued in June 2008. The approved post-mining land use is rangeland. The <br />mine site was surrounded by the following land uses: residential, agricultural, and rangeland. Portions of the <br />112c Ted Franciscotti Pit No.1 were permitted over top of areas previously permitted by two separate 111 permits <br />held by D.G. Huskin Construction Co. The two 111 permits held by D.G. Huskin Construction Co. have been <br />terminated by the Division. It also appears that the site may have been permitted over top of a pre-law mining <br />disturbance. Many remnants of historic mining are present throughout Phase 1. Also unreclaimed slopes of the <br />pre-law mining operation are scattered throughout the northern portion of Phase 1. Many of the areas disturbed <br />by the pre-law historic mining have filled in with a mixture of volunteer vegetation. <br /> <br />No problems or possible violations were observed during the inspection. During the inspection, the sky was <br />slightly overcast. There was partial snow cover, covering approximately 15% of the ground. The site was not <br />active during the inspection, it appears that the site sees infrequent mining operations. It appears that historic <br />mining started just south of the crest of the Huerfano River terrace and progressed to the south, east, and west, <br />thus creating an odd shaped excavation. The 2 terminated 111 permits sit further south and west than the pre- <br />law mining disturbance. At the present time it appears that the current mining operation has affected a small <br />portion of phase 1 throughout the life of the permit. The current mining disturbance is located along the eastern <br />portion of phase 1. <br /> <br />Backfilling and Grading: <br />There were several stockpiles of product, overburden, and reject scattered throughout Phase 1. Since the permit <br />was issued it appears that the Operator has mined a small area along the eastern portion of phase 1, thus creating <br />a small U shaped mining face. The mining face was approximately 10 to 15 feet high. When completing final <br />reclamation, the Operator will need to grade all slopes to 3H:1V or flatter to comply with the approved reclamation <br />plan. It also appears that the reject pile in the southwest corner of phase 1 has had material removed from the <br />southwest side of the stockpile. There was a small recent excavation in one of the in the pre-law pit walls, the <br />Operator’s representative believed that the landowner may have taken a little material out of the pre-law <br />excavation. <br /> <br />Financial Warranty: <br />The current amount of financial warranty the Operator has on deposit with the State is $81,383. The reclamation <br />cost estimate for this site was updated during the file review for this inspection. It was determined that the current <br />required financial warranty amount is adequate to cover the current mining related disturbance. <br /> <br />Hydrologic Balance: <br />The current pit excavation is located on a gravel terrace just south of the Huerfano River. There was no evidence <br />of excessive erosion. There appeared to be no significant impacts to the prevailing hydrologic balance. <br /> <br /> <br />