My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:21:06 PM
Creation date
4/26/2016 9:59:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/25/2016
Doc Name
Motion of the Debtors and Debtors in Possession
From
United States Bankruptcy Court
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MPB
JRS
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 16-42529 Doc 32 Filed 04/13/16 Entered 04/13/16 11:43:47 Main Document <br />Pg9of21 <br />Bank, N.A., 762 F.2d 1303, 1309 (5th Cir. 1985) and In re Defender Drug Stores, Inc., 145 B.R. <br />312, 317 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1992)). See also Crystalin, L.L.C. v. Selma Props. Inc. (In re <br />Crystalin, L.L.C.), 293 B.R. 455, 463-64 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2003) (holding that the business <br />judgment rule may be satisfied "'as long as the proposed action appears to enhance the debtor's <br />estate."') (quoting Four B. Corp. v. Food Barn Stores, Inc. (In re Food Barn Stores Inc.), 107 <br />F.3d 558, 567 n.16 (8th Cir. 1997)) (emphasis in original, internal quotations and alterations <br />omitted); Four B. Corp. v. Food Barn Stores, Inc. (In re Food Barn Stores Inc.), 107 F.3d 558, <br />567 n.16 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding that "[w]here the [debtor's] request is not manifestly <br />unreasonable or made in bad faith, the court should normally grant approval 'as long as the <br />proposed action appears to enhance the debtor's estate"') (quoting Richmond Leasing Co. v. <br />Capital Bank, N.A., 762 F.2d 1303, 1309 (5th Cir. 1985) (internal alterations and quotations <br />omitted)); Official Comm. Of Subordinated Bondholders v. Integrated Res. Inc (In re Integrated <br />Res. Inc.), 147 B.R. 650, 656 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (finding that "[c]ourts are loath to interfere with <br />corporate decisions absent a showing of bad faith, self-interest, or gross negligence"). <br />19. The Debtors submit that the requested relief represents a sound exercise of their <br />business judgment, is necessary to avoid immediate and irreparable harm and is justified under <br />sections 105(a) and 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. If authorization to perform and enter into <br />transactions under the ADM Agreement is not granted, the Debtors will be at a financial <br />disadvantage vis-a-vis their competitors, and the Debtors will be unable to take advantage of <br />their expertise in the industry and the common industry practice employed to hedge risk and <br />manage expenses. As such, the Debtors respectfully request the entry of an order providing that <br />the Debtors are authorized to enter into and consummate transactions under the ADM Agreement <br />without further order of the Court. <br />KIM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.