My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:21:06 PM
Creation date
4/26/2016 9:59:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/25/2016
Doc Name
Motion of the Debtors and Debtors in Possession
From
United States Bankruptcy Court
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MPB
JRS
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 16-42529 Doc 32 Filed 04/13/16 Entered 04/13/16 11:43:47 Main Document <br />Pg8of21 <br />estate." 11 U.S.C. § 363(b)(1). A debtor's decisions to use, sell or lease assets outside the <br />ordinary course of business must be based upon a sound business purpose. See In re Channel <br />One Commc'ns, Inc., 117 B.R. 493,496 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1990) (citing Comm. of Equily Sec. <br />Holders v. Lionel Cort. (In re Lionel Corp.), 722 F.2d 1063, 1071 (2d Cir. 1983)). See also TLP <br />Servs. LLC v. Stoebner (In re Polaroid Corp.), 460 B.R. 740, 741-42 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2011) <br />(allowing a trustee, pursuant in part to section 363(b)(1), to use cash collateral to fund efforts to <br />recover funds from third parties); accord Comm. of Equity Sec. Holders v. Lionel Corp. (In re <br />Lionel Com.), 722 F.2d 1063, 1070-71 (2d Cir. 1983) (requiring a "good business reason" to <br />approve a sale pursuant to section 363(b)); In re W.A. Mallory Co. Inc., 214 B.R. 834, 836 <br />(Bankr. E.D. Va. 1997) ("This Court follows the 'sound business purpose' test when examining <br />§ 363(b) sales.") (citing WBQ P'ship v Va. Dep't of Med. Assistance Servs. (In re WBQ P'ship), <br />189 B.R. 97, 102 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995)); Official Comm. Of Unsecured Creditors of LTV <br />Aerospace & Def. Co. v. LTV Corp. (In re Chateaugay Corp.), 973 F.2d 141, 143 (2d Cir. 1992) <br />(holding that the sale of property of the estate is justified if it is supported by a good business <br />reason); In re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc., 100 B.R. 670, 675 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1989) (noting that the <br />standard for determining a motion pursuant to section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code is "a good <br />business reason"). <br />18. Courts have consistently been reluctant to interfere with corporate decisions <br />unless "it is made clear that those decisions are, inter alia, clearly erroneous, made arbitrarily, are <br />in breach of the officers' and directors' fiduciary duty to the corporation, are made on the basis of <br />inadequate information or study, are made in bad faith, or are in violation of the Bankruptcy <br />Code." In re Farmland Indus., Inc., 294 B.R 855, 881 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2003) (citing In re <br />United Artists Theatre Co., 315 F.3d 217, 233 (3d Cir. 2003), Richmond Leasing Co. v. Capital <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.