Laserfiche WebLink
Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. <br /> Ms. Amy Eschberger <br /> Mr. Wally Erickson <br /> April 18, 2016 <br /> Page 4 <br /> those and my conversations with Buck Ingersoll can confirm the statements that the deer, elk, <br /> bobcats, mountain lions, elk, black bear, coyote, fox, a multitude of small mammals, a wide <br /> variety of birds of prey and a huge wild turkey population thrive in this location. I have never <br /> been on the Ingersoll Ranch when I did not encounter wild turkeys -- they are in abundance. <br /> This wildlife is dependent upon the water, protection and the important and unique migration <br /> routes that Little Turkey Creek provides. Even the Application admits that the proposed site is a <br /> migration corridor for elk and habitat for the endangered Mexican spotted owl. The quarry plan <br /> will essentially cut off and thus threaten this critical wildlife resource. Significantly, both the <br /> statutory provisions and the applicable Rules and Regulations require that the safety and <br /> protection of wildlife be considered in the application process. See C.R.S. § 34-32.5-102 and 2 <br /> CCR 407-1, Rule 3.1.8. <br /> Impacts to Water Resources <br /> The Ingersoll Ranch is served by a deep well into a rare aquifer. What is certain about <br /> this area generally is that water is scarce and the water supplies are critical. We have not had the <br /> opportunity to consult an expert regarding water issues, but believe that there is risk to the water <br /> supplies due to the excavation and blasting. The area has may fractured granite structures which <br /> could be disturbed and altered from blasting, with potential adverse impact to existing shallow <br /> and perhaps deeper aquifers. The Application hardly mentions or addresses ground water which <br /> is a concern because all the residents in the vicinity of the proposed mine and in the Highway <br /> 115 corridor use fragile aquifers and wells for their domestic water supply. Further study of this <br /> issue is merited. <br /> Reclamation <br /> Reclamation is always a challenge, and the struggle that Transit Mix has had with the <br /> scar on the north side of Colorado Springs is a living example. While Transmit Mix has a <br /> proposed reclamation plan, from our reading of the plan and the review of the plan by others <br /> with greater expertise, it is clear that it does not propose to return the quarry site to the unique <br /> and pristine eco system and environment that exists today. Statutory provisions require that the <br /> reclamation plan provide for revegetation that is at least equal to the natural vegetation of the <br /> surrounding area — a requirement that is virtually impossible given the special and unique <br /> characteristics of the area. See C.R.S. § 34-32.5-116(4)(f). It would appear that the proposal is <br /> to provide some "generic" revegetation, and not provide for the diverse and unique species that <br /> exist and make that area special today. While the ultimate success of the proposed reclamation is <br /> questionable itself, it is clear that even under the best assumptions, we would be losing forever <br /> this special and unique eco system which has previously been determined to be worthy of <br /> preservation. That would be a sad day and a bad mistake by Colorado if the Application were to <br /> be approved. <br />