My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-19_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (32)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016010
>
2016-04-19_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (32)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2021 10:36:46 AM
Creation date
4/19/2016 6:19:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/19/2016
Doc Name
Letter of Opposition
From
Milliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet PC
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mulliken Weiner Berg & Jolivet P.C. <br /> Ms. Amy Eschberger <br /> Mr. Wally Erickson <br /> April 18, 2016 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 2001 as a B2 site — Very high significance. A part of that area is the Aiken Canyon preserve <br /> property, which is already being preserved by The Nature Conservancy. Aiken Canyon is a very <br /> unique property and is immediately adjacent to the land proposed to be mined. Aiken Canyon is <br /> very special due to its unique plant and abundant wildlife. It is my recollection that Buck <br /> Ingersoll, prior to his death, and his wife, Barbara Ingersoll, who lives on the Ingersoll Ranch, <br /> devoted time and significant resources to preserve Aiken Canyon, and previously assisted in a <br /> successful effort to prevent expansion of the near-by Menzer Quarry to prevent further <br /> destruction of this unique and special environment. <br /> Mr. Ingersoll's estate plan, which is embodied in the Trust, provides for expansion and <br /> further preservation of the Aiken Canyon environment. Mr. Ingersoll's Trust provides for <br /> distribution of all but 40 acres of the Ingersoll Ranch to be divided between The Nature <br /> Conservancy, to add ground to the area already preserved and protected as Aiken Canyon, and <br /> the other half to be distributed to the El Pomar Foundation, which will also preserve the land. <br /> You currently have letters of objection from The Nature Conservancy. We are authorized to <br /> indicate that the El Pomar Foundation also opposes the Application. <br /> I am not a biologist, but note for you the expertise of The Nature Conservancy and past <br /> study and work done by the late Professor Bidelman at Colorado College. I am endeavoring to <br /> obtain copies of the studies and opinions of Professor Bidelman, which you may already have in <br /> your files, and will provide those to you in the future once obtained. The State of Colorado, <br /> through its Natural Heritage Program, has identified this exact area as having "very high <br /> significance" because of its important plant and wildlife communities. It is also part of a unique <br /> and small area of Colorado where the Peaks to Plains ecosystems come together and overlap. <br /> Per The Nature Conservancy, this area "merits the highest standards of inventory and <br /> protection." <br /> This area is a very unique and unreplaceable environment which deserves to be <br /> preserved. El Paso County has formally recognized that fact in the Southwestern/Highway 115 <br /> Comprehensive Plan it adopted years ago which states: "The specific area of Aiken's Canyon is <br /> identified as a unique and significant biological resource of State-wide significance that should <br /> continue to be preserved. Preservation is not compatible with most public access, and <br /> management should maximize wildlife and scientific values."' This land is precious and rare, as <br /> has been acknowledged repeatedly. You do not reach that conclusion reading the Application. <br /> If you are not willing to accept El Paso County's opinion regarding the preservation value of this <br /> area, it would be prudent to obtain a report from an independent and qualified biologist as to <br /> whether the proposed site is in fact special and should be preserved. We would be willing to <br /> ' El Paso County Southwestern/Highway 115 Comprehensive Plan, Policy 2T Interestingly, Rose Mary <br /> Almendinger, who previously owned the site now proposed for the mine, was a member of the <br /> Southwestern/Highway 115 Citizen's Advisory Committee that wrote this plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.