Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Wally Erickson April 14, 2016 Objection to Permit Application#M-2016-010 <br /> Highway access is relevant in the context of general safety. The proposed gravel access road <br /> must enter State Highway 115. This is subject to securing an Access Permit from CDOT. <br /> Access permits are regulated by specific guidelines. There is no discussion of how those <br /> requirements will be met. Note that the steep grade immediately north of the proposed SH 115 <br /> access point includes a single northbound lane. This single lane has a steep downward <br /> gradient. Approximately a third way down the hill is the intersection with Paseo Corto, a major <br /> entry to Red Rock Valley. There is also a permitted private driveway south of Paseo Corto. <br /> Northbound access to both would involve significant danger from filled gravel trucks trying to <br /> gain speed as they travel down the hill. <br /> A second major objection element is the impact on the environment and bio-diversity of the <br /> area. We have lived here since 1984 and followed the creation of the Aiken Canyon Preserve by <br /> Nature Conservancy. We include a copy of their letter dated April 11, 2016 and concur with <br /> their concerns. Further, we believe the proposed quarry is inconsistent with the biology of the <br /> surrounding area. <br /> The third specific concern is reclamation. The Transit Mix proposal does not include relevant <br /> specifics for a successful reclamation. The ecosystem of the site and the surrounding area <br /> includes highly complex and significant conservation issues. The standard plan of replacing <br /> topsoil, "native" grasses and a mix of trees is not reclamation but a mutation of what was <br /> destroyed. Please refer again to the Nature Conservancy letter (April 11, 2016). In Tom's <br /> professional investigations and appraisals of fire-damaged lands that include pinion-juniper-pine <br /> environments, he found that successful re-cultivation of the destroyed biome is physically <br /> unlikely and economically infeasible. <br /> The fourth major concern is the impact on water resources. This area has challenging water <br /> availability. Red Rock Valley is within the South Colorado Springs Red Rock Valley Estates <br /> Water District. The District's water sources include several wells. The wells are located in <br /> heavily fractured areas that could be impacted by weekly blasting at the proposed quarry. <br /> There is also potential for water contamination. The Transit Mix permit application does not <br /> address this issue sufficiently. As a former District Board member, Tom believes it is unlikely <br /> that Transit Mix can show adequate support to show the lack of potential harm to adjudicated <br /> water resources. <br /> The application also notes that water will be used for dust suppression at the quarry site and <br /> presumably along the haul road. It states that the water source will likely be the City of Colorado <br /> Springs ten miles to the north. This will add to the traffic generation. An alternative stated in the <br /> application is use of on-site water from wells or surface rights. There is no indication given <br /> whether the surface rights are adequate in amount or appropriately adjudicated. Any well water <br /> use would likely require an augmentation plan approval, an issue that is not addressed. Most <br /> well augmentation plan applications generate significant objections from down stream water <br /> users. It is not unusual for the process to take years. <br /> 2 <br />