My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-15_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016010
>
2016-04-15_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2021 10:36:45 AM
Creation date
4/19/2016 6:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/15/2016
Doc Name
Letter of Concern
From
Nancy Reed
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
will the SWMP be available for review? Will the Colorado Water Commissioner be reviewing the plans for <br /> the sediment ponds to assess the impact of these ponds on water rights of the Little Turkey Creek <br /> watershed? <br /> e-5 28. Revegetation. "All areas will be seeded with the grass seed mix included in Table E-1 to provide a base <br /> revegetated cover." <br /> Question: Could wild flower seeds be added to this mix to improve the aesthetics of the reve etated areas? <br /> E-5 29. Revegetation. "The reclamation plan for the quarry areas includes re-establishment of a Douglas Fir- <br /> Lodgepole pine forest." <br /> Questions: There is a much greater diversity of trees currently in the canyon than proposed to be replaced <br /> within the reclamation plan. There currently are no Lodgepole pines in the canyon; why are these going to <br /> be introduced into the canyon? Why isn't the same level of diversity planned for reclamation? Could aspen <br /> be added to this mix to improve the aesthetics of the reve etated areas? <br /> E-5 30. "A mixed shrub community of Gambel's Oak and Mountain Mahogany will be established along the access <br /> road corridor. The Gambel's Oak-Mountain Mahogany community near the base of the property will be <br /> planted with 336 oak or mahogany plugs/acre, supplemented by other woody species including soapweed <br /> yucca, Wood's rose, Cliff spirea at a rate of 200 stems per acre." <br /> Question: Gambel Oak can present an extreme fire hazard; many homeowners in the area are attempting to <br /> remove or reduce the number of these. Can plants be selected for their fire resistance? <br /> E-5 31. "Plantings along waterways will be supplemented with deciduous species, including cottonless <br /> cottonwood, native willow species, wild plum, snowberry and chokecherry to enhance diversity <br /> for wildlife." <br /> Question: the plan indicated that there would be no disturbance within 100 feet of Little Turkey Creek or <br /> Deadman's creek. What waterways are meant here? Just the crossing at Little Turkey Creek and the <br /> crossing at Deadman's creek <br /> E-5 32. "Timing of reseeding will be key to the success of the reclamation effort." <br /> Question: Since this is a phased reclamation process,how often will the topsoil and fines piles be reseeded? <br /> E-5 33. "Prior to planting, bare root seedlings will be dipped in a mycorrhizal solution or inoculant." <br /> Question: What other chemicals will be used in quarry reclamation? <br /> Exhibit G G-5 34. "Due to the small data set of measured flow, maximum calculated flow was set at the maximum measured <br /> Water Information flow plus two standard deviations of the data set resulting in a maximum calculated flow cap of 20.11 cfs". <br /> Questions: What is meant by the"maximum calculated flow cap"? How is that figure used in later <br /> analyses? Given that only three data points were collected over a three month period, is the data even <br /> sufficient to be used in later analyses? The maximum flow that we have seen in recent floods in the lower <br /> canyon is FAR greater than the 20.11 cfs. For example, the floods last May overwhelmed the culverts about <br /> 200 ards west of the measuring site. Their capacity was 70 cfs. <br /> G-6 35. "Fi ure G-4 illustrated the flow h dro ra h at USGS 7099220 during its operating <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.