My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-01_INSPECTION - M2012016
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M2012016
>
2016-04-01_INSPECTION - M2012016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:20:31 PM
Creation date
4/7/2016 3:28:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012016
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
4/1/2016
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Puckette Land Company
Inspection Date
3/22/2016
Email Name
ACY
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M-2012-016 <br />INSPECTOR’S INITIALS: ACY <br />INSPECTION DATE: March 22, 2016 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />approved plans. Option 2: by July 1, 2016 submit a new 112c permit application with commercial/industrial as <br />post mining land use. Slopes may be worked upon permit approval to match the new permits reclamation <br />requirements if necessary. The Division request that by Friday, May 06, 2016 we are notified in writing of <br />which option Puckett Land Company will use to resolve this matter. <br /> <br />The reclamation plan also states that if necessary weed free hay or straw mulch will be applied at 2 tons/acre <br />and crimped 1-2” into place. Likewise fertilizers or soil amendments may also be necessary. If fertilizer is <br />applied it shall be 40 lbs. of Nitrogen and 20 lbs. of Phosphorus. To improve soil texture, manure with 60% by <br />weight of large chunks was recommended, no powder amendments. To date only grading and drill seeding has <br />been implemented. <br /> <br />Given the lack of native vegetation establishment, aggressive weed management is also recommended to <br />prevent weed establishment from hindering revegetation success. Hard alkali soil patches were observed. To <br />some extent this is natural but from field observations it was apparent that there is a lack of quality topsoil <br />material which is also hindering revegetation success. The operator would likely benefit from fertilizer, soil <br />amendments or additional top soil being brought in. Also mulching after seeding will help hold in the moisture <br />and provide a more conducive environment for germination. Based on staff observations these additional <br />steps are necessary to achieve the approved rangeland post mining land use. <br /> <br />Staff also explained that it’s the Divisions policy that reclamation needs a minimum of 2 growing seasons <br />before it can be evaluated for release. This helps the Division ensure that vegetation is sustainable. In some <br />cases vegetation may be deemed adequate sooner or in arid or challenging areas it may require more time. <br />This site has proved challenging and successful reclamation will likely take several years to achieve. <br /> <br />Areas south of the power lines to the Hwy 6 fence have adequate vegetation density at this time. Some weeds <br />were observed but no significant infestations. The Division would like re-evaluate vegetation later this spring <br />once more plants have had time to germinate. This will ensure that established vegetation is diverse and can <br />be better evaluated for sustainability. <br /> <br />The majority of the inspection entailed discussions of options moving forward towards releasing the site. St aff <br />gave suggestions as mentioned above, of potential ways to improve reclamation success. Any minor <br />deviations from the approved reclamation plan will require a technical revision (TR) prior to implementing. <br />The fee associated with a TR is $216.00 and several minor changes can all be made under one TR request. <br />Additionally an operator may only make changes defined under Rule 1.1(49). Changing post mining land use <br />may not be done under a TR. The process of making this change was outlined in the January 20 15 inspection <br />report. The operator was notified that according to Rule 1.10.2, no amendments are allowed by State Statute <br />for a Special Operation 111 permit. The result is that the Operator must submit a new permit as a 112(c) <br />application. The fee associated with the new permit application is $2,696.00. Much of the permit application <br />exhibits can be used from the original 111 permit application, but re-submitted in the new application <br />package. <br /> <br />One idea that was discussed is to do a partial acreage release of land with successful reclamation. Then obtain <br />a new 112c permit to overlap the existing unreleased portion of the 111c permit. T he post mine land use <br />would be commercial/industrial and shall comply with Rule 3. Once land is stabilized the operator may request <br />a full release to close out the permit. The operators end goal for this location is to become a truck stop. This <br />will require proof of county review and zoning issues prior to release.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.