My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-01_INSPECTION - M2012016
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M2012016
>
2016-04-01_INSPECTION - M2012016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:20:31 PM
Creation date
4/7/2016 3:28:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012016
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
4/1/2016
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Puckette Land Company
Inspection Date
3/22/2016
Email Name
ACY
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M-2012-016 <br />INSPECTOR’S INITIALS: ACY <br />INSPECTION DATE: March 22, 2016 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 2 of 11 <br /> <br />OBSERVATIONS <br /> <br />This inspection was conducted as part of the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) <br />normal monitoring program. The Nolte Pit #1 is a Special Operations 111c permitted site that includes a total <br />of 22.34 permitted acres. This site is located approximately 0.75 miles west of Parachute, Colorado in Garfield <br />County and is accessed from Highway 6. Chuck Whiteman and Jeff Simonson represented Puckett Land <br />Company and accompanied Amy Yeldell of the Division on the inspection. <br /> <br />Mining was completed in the fall of 2012. And in the 2013 annual report the site was declared to be in final <br />reclamation. <br /> <br />The mine identification sign and affected area boundary markers are in place and in compliance 3.1.12. A sign <br />is posted at the natural gas pad entrance from Highway 6. Please note that the mining plan designates a <br />different site access location. Please resolve this in the form of a revision. The permit boundary is clearly <br />delineated by wire fence and T-posts. The natural gas pad is located within the mining permit boundary. A <br />clear distinction needs to be made between the gas pad’s footprint that is covered under the Colorado Oil and <br />Gas Conservation Commission’s (COGCC) jurisdiction and what remain Puckett Land Company’s reclamation <br />responsibility. Land that does not meet the mining permit’s reclamation requirements but the operator <br />wishes to release will require a statement from the COGCC acknowledging that they have jurisdiction and will <br />assume responsibility for reclamation of affected land s. This documentation should be submitted with an <br />acreage release request. <br /> <br />No fuel or structures related to mining remain in place. <br /> <br />In the January 2015 inspection erosion was cited as a problem. Specifically “The rills and gullies observed in <br />December 2012 are still evident. It does not appear that the Operator has conducted any maintenance on the <br />site since it was last inspected by the Division. There are rills and gullies forming on the outsides of the <br />channels. More grading is necessary to complete the final grade of 3:1 slopes as submitted in the reclamation <br />plan” As a result slopes were reworked in 2015. All problems have been abated. Currently slopes are bare and <br />hard packed. Some new riling and sediment erosion was observed from spring snow melt. No off site damages <br />were observed. Without vegetation establishment the operator will continue to struggle with erosion and thus <br />it is not cited as a problem at this time. Little to no vegetation has been established on the slopes. It is unclear <br />if seeding was conducted post grading. The Division gave no guidance to construct terraces to better control <br />stormwater. For the most part the terraces are intact but some blow outs and undermining from ponding <br />water was observed. Less recently disturbed soils have a higher concentration of vegetation and are closer to <br />meeting the reclamation requirements. Several rock armored ditches have been constructed as well as check <br />dams and sediment ponds. The operator is encouraged to monitor and properly maintain the stormwater <br />BMPs and slopes to avoid potential future violations and/or problems. <br /> <br />Under the approved reclamation plan all slopes should be graded to a 3:1. The center slope 150ft wide and 50 <br />ft. vertical is permitted to be 2.5:1. Division staff would like to clarify that the reclamation plan does not <br />mention terracing. This discrepancy in field conditions not following the reclamation plan can be resolved one <br />of two ways. Option 1: by June 3, 2016 submit a technical revision clarifying that terracing may be used in <br />conjunction with smooth 3:1 sloping where deemed necessary for erosion protection. Also clarify any other <br />changes you wish to make to improve reclamation success or where field conditions deviate from the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.