Laserfiche WebLink
Table 1 — Specific Midterm Review Topics <br />Section Topic Applicability at Williams Fork Mines <br />2.06.2(10) <br />Experimental practices <br />Inapplicable, no such practices. <br />2.06.3(4)(a) <br />Mountaintop removal <br />Inapplicable, no such variances. <br />variances <br />Variances from <br />2.06.5(3)(c) <br />approximate original <br />contour for steep slope <br />Inapplicable, no such variances. <br />mining <br />Reclamation delay at <br />2.06.7(5) <br />combined <br />Inapplicable, no such variances. <br />surface/subsurface mines <br />3.02.2(4) <br />Adequacy of bond <br />Applicable. <br />amount and terms <br />Regarding steep slopes (Rules 2.06.4, 2.06.5, and 4.27), no specific approvals have been granted to MCM for the <br />Williams Fork Mines. <br />Midterm Review Methodoloay <br />For this Midterm Review, the Division reviewed the following documents: <br />1. Permit application; <br />2. Revisions made to the permit since the last permit renewal; <br />3. Annual reclamation and hydrology reports; <br />4. Bond surety and reclamation cost estimate; <br />5. Division findings documents and previous Midterm Reviews; <br />6. Notices of violations since last permit renewal, if any. <br />C1981044 Midterm 2016 Findings.docx Page 2 <br />