Laserfiche WebLink
§2.09 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR SURFACE OR UNDERGROUND MINING ACTIVITIES -- <br />MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR INFORMATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES <br />2.09.8 Climatological Information <br />(1) Climate Characteristics of the North Fork Valley (COnt'd.) <br />(b) and (c) (Cont'd.) <br />The operator compiled snow course data in 1982 - 1985. The courses are <br />located in the Stevens Gulch Drainage Basin and are used to confirm snow <br />melt v.s. rainfall data. Enough data was collected td confirm existing <br />government published data. The operator subsequently discontinued <br />monitoring of snow courses. <br />In response to Stipulation Number 5 of the Division's proposed Decision <br />and Findings of Compliance dated June 29, 1985, the operator began <br />operating an evaporation pan station at the Stevens Gulch well field. Data <br />was to be gathered until the hydrologic budget for the drainage basin was <br />confined in order to provide a basis for distinguishing between natural <br />and mine related water losses within the basin. <br /> <br />Subsequent evaluation of the evaporation pan and related data was <br />conducted by the operator in March of 1992. The operator concluded that <br />insufficient data had been collected to define a detailed water budget for <br />the Stevens Gulch drainage capable of distinguishing between natural and <br />mine related water losses for specific resources within the basin. The <br />operator further concluded that the scope and quantity of additional data <br />required to accurately assess the water budget was prohibitive and of <br />limited value given that the pre-mining water budget was not accurately <br />defined and therefore no basis for comparison exists. Based upon these <br />conclusions, the operator applied to the Division of Minerals and Geology <br />for a technical revision (TR-21) to eliminate the requirement to operate <br />the evaporation pan. The technical revision was subsequently approved by <br />the Division. <br />The operator [used] two high volume particulate samplers for sampling <br />large volumes of air for the collection of suspended particulate matter. <br />These samplers [were] located as shown on the Bowie No. 1 Mine Facilities <br />Map No. 8A-8. Each filter for these units was weighed and then sent to the <br />operator and placed in the samplers. The units were set to run on the <br />Colorado Department of Health, Air Pollution Control Division's 9-day <br />schedule. After running for 24 hours, the filters were stored for future <br />weighing and analyses. The results of the analyses were then summarized in <br />a report. For additional information, see Climatology Appendix, Volume 9. <br />Tables 2.09-17 & 18 in the Climatology Appendix, Volume 9, set forth the <br />Air Quality Data Reports on the total suspended particulates measured in <br />g/m' since June, 1979, at the two monitoring stations. Data collected from <br />1979 to 1983 are also included. A maximum 24 hour particulate loading of <br />69 u/m' is fairly close to the national mean for non-urban regions. <br />The ability to define, measure, and control anthropogenic (man-caused) <br />visibility impairment depends upon several fundamental factors. These <br />include: a) the <br />I• <br />/~2-l 0 8 <br />H PP.2o v~ <br />6/24/D y <br />Revised 03/17/93 <br />Revised 09/21/01 <br />63 <br />