My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:18:57 PM
Creation date
2/29/2016 8:56:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/2016
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 1 2.04 Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
42,04 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR SDRFACE OR IINDERGROUND MINING ACTIVITIES -- <br />MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR INFORMATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES. <br /> <br />2.04,7 Hydrology Description. <br />(2) Surface Water Information. <br />(a) and (b) (Cont'd,) <br />Analysis of irriga[ion return flow below Paonia by the <br />Colorado Department of Health showed an increase in to- <br />tal hardness of 817 percent, calcium hardness of 998 <br />percent, specific conductance of 630 percent, chlorides <br />of 157 percent, and suspended solids of 1,200 percent <br />(U. S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Manage- <br />ment 1977). Data on water quality presented in Table <br />2.04-9 in the Surface Water Appendix, Volume 4, shows <br />that streams draining the coal areas have significantly <br />higher dissolved solids concentrations than river <br />draining the mountain areas. However, assuming an <br />average dissolved solids concentration in runoff from <br />the coal areas of 55,000 tons per year, the impact con- <br />stitutes only about 1.7 percent of the total dissolved <br />solids load yielded by the Upper Main Stem of the Colo- <br />rado River in Colorado (Table 2.04-10 in the Surface <br />Water Appendix, Volune 4). <br />• A reliable comparison of suspended sediment loads <br />yielded by the coal areas with that yielded by the <br />overall areas can probably not be made from [he meager <br />data in Table 2.04-11 in the Surface Water Appendix, <br />Volume 4. Those data show that the estimated annual <br />unit suspended sediment yields from the coal water <br />sheds were all substantially less than the correspond- <br />ing value for the Colorado River near the state line. <br />Normally, sediment yield per unit area of watershed de- <br />creases progressively with increasing size of a basin <br />because of deposi[ion ci(a part of tt~e load as flows <br />move downstream and bottom lands comprise a larger per- <br />centage of the watershed, Far example, Hadley and <br />Schumm (1961) report that annual sediment yields on <br />Lance Creek in eastern Wyoming decreased from 1.10 ac- <br />ft/sq-mi in the headwater areas to 0.33 ac-ft/sq-mi on <br />the main stem, as th size of the watershed increased <br />from about 0.5 to about 2,000 square miles. On that <br />basis, long-term unit sediment yields from the small <br />coal areas listed in Table 2.04-11 would be expected to <br />be three to four times as high as that from the Colora- <br />do River near the state line. <br />. Revised 10/01/87 <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.