My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
2016-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981038 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:18:57 PM
Creation date
2/29/2016 8:56:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/2016
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 1 2.04 Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
42.04 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR SURFACE OR UNDERGROUND MINING ACTIVITIES -- <br />~ MINIMDM REQUIREMENTS FOR INFORMATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL RESOIIRCES. <br />2,04,7 Hydrology Description. <br />(1) (b) (Cont'd J <br />features, where presumably near surface groundwater <br />flow saturates the regolith, resulting in slump struc- <br />tures with attendant springs and seeps and infiltrates <br />back into the colluvium. Cumulative discharge repre- <br />sents a small fraction of total run-off, and most of <br />the available near surface groundwater is believed to <br />be transpired by native vegetation. bTymore (1974) <br />states, "that natural plant associations have normal <br />evapotranspiration rates that far exceed normal precip- <br />itation during the growing season, which effectively <br />prevents deep percolation losses during most of the <br />year" for the Piceance and Yellow Creek watersheds of <br />West-Central Colorado. For specific information re- <br />garding origin, use, and field parameters for each <br />spring, consult the Ground Water Appendix, Volune 4. <br />The contribution of spring discharge to stream flow in <br />individual watersheds on a monthly basis is insignifi- <br />cant; typically, stream flow is many orders of magnitude <br />• greater than spring discharge. Spring flow is ambigu- <br />ously highest during peak stream flow due to super <br />saturation and very near surface flow in the colluvium <br />(refer to hydrology monitoring graphs in Volume 4). <br />The significance of spring discharges to maintaining <br />stream flow is virtually nonexistent, as demonstrated in <br />Volinne SA. The evapotranspiration demands of vegeta- <br />tion, small cumulative discharge, and gain-loss data <br />presented by Brooks (1982) indicates that streams tra- <br />versing the permit area are losing flow, and spring <br />discharge does not enhance the ephemeral nature of <br />streamflow. The significance of springs to maintaining <br />the land use patterns of the area is described in the <br />Probable Hydrologic Impact, Section 2.05.6. Generally, <br />Coll w ial springs are marginally suitable for human <br />consumption with the exception of fecal coliform levels <br />which typically rise due to livestock pollution and are <br />acceptable for Livestock use. Small discharges pre- <br />clude any agricultural or aquatic use. <br />Colluvial springs are typically characterized by total <br />dissolved solids values less than 1,000 mg/1 and are <br />• Added 12/26/84 <br />Revised 12/26/84 <br />Revised 10/12/86 <br />Revised 10/01/87 <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.