My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-02-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2016-02-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:19:26 PM
Creation date
2/26/2016 2:18:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/23/2016
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings & Cost Estimate (SL3)
From
DRMS
To
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc.
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
within the affected area throughout the mining and reclamation process. Reviews of water quality <br />data indicate that operations at the loadout have not had a deleterious impact on the hydrologic <br />functions. <br />In addition to protection of the hydrologic functions, agricultural productivity must be reestablished for <br />alluvial valley floors (Rule 3.03.1(3)(b)). On August 4, 2004 Linda Craven, Soil Scientist with the <br />Natural Resources Conservation Service, sampled the soils of the Southfield loadout and the adjacent <br />undisturbed lands. Her conclusions and those discussed in a follow up letter from Roy Roper of <br />NRCS on August 25, 2004 indicate that the soils of the loadout and the adjacent undisturbed areas are <br />similar and would both support agricultural functions. <br />In conclusion, the Division finds that the AVF functions have been restored. <br />SUSPENDED SOLIDS DEMONSTRATION <br />The SL -03 application contained a sediment demonstration, utilizing the RUSLE equation, to <br />illustrate that the contribution of suspended solids to streamflow outside the permit areas is not <br />greater for the reclaimed area than adjacent non -mined areas. After adequacy items were addressed, <br />this demonstration met that objective and the requirements of Rule 3.03.1(3)(b). <br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br />Based upon a review of the mine permit, the applicant's bond release application, and site inspections, <br />the Division finds that Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. has replaced topsoil in accordance with the approved <br />reclamation plan. Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. has established vegetation which supports the approved post <br />mine land use and meets the approved success standard for vegetative cover. The Division finds that the <br />reclaimed area subject to this bond release is not contributing suspended solids to streamflow or runoff <br />outside the permit area in excess of premining levels or in excess of adjacent nonmined areas. <br />' . EX3 11 <br />REVEGETATION <br />Vegetation sampling criteria are discussed above in the Criteria and Schedule for Bond Release. An <br />overview of the sampling methodology is presented in the Phase II portion of these Observations and <br />Findings. Additional detail regarding both criteria and methodology can be found in the PAP and <br />SL -03 application. <br />EFCI met or exceeded the reclamation success standards for the reclaimed areas for 2013 and 2014. <br />Allowable cover, forage productivity, woody plant density and plant species diversity were all found <br />to meet or exceed the reclamation standards. <br />Southfield Mine SL -03 Page 18 of 21 February 23, 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.