My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2016-01-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2017 9:56:06 AM
Creation date
2/11/2016 10:27:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/7/2016
Doc Name
Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3)
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
long. The low flow rates average about 17 gpm and represent no irrigation for about 200 days per <br />year. The average annual flow rate is therefore on the order of about 28 gpm or about 5390 <br />ft3/day. This flow rate compares well with the flow rate of about 27 gpm calculated by <br />subtracting the flow in Nygren Draw (SW -N6) from the flow rate at NPDES 001, (see Table <br />2.04.7-5 in Section 2.04.7). This further suggests that once the irrigation water is diverted into <br />the HDPE pipeline that highwall seepage should be more on the order of about 17gpm (< 3300 <br />ft'/day) and then decrease as the bedrock zones dry out. <br />The bedrock zones are tight, with low transmissivity (measured OB and Coal Zone <br />transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity at 58 ft2/day and 2.1 ft/day respectively at GW -N9) <br />which results in limited but steep cones of depression. The old Peabody Nucla Mine (New <br />Horizon #1 Area) is again instructive as the hydrograph of GW -N8 (see pg. 7-1-75 of New <br />Horizon 1 Mine Area Permit) shows the water level was first affected by the mining in <br />November 1980. At that time the coal face was about 760 ft from hole GW -N8. Total draw down <br />at GW -N8 after 2 years and 9 months was 12.24 ft. Monitor hole GW -N9 at a distance of 854 ft <br />from the final high -wall has never been affected, (see GW -N8 and GW -N9 hydrographs in <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3)-2; Figures 2.05.6(3)-2a and 2.05.6(3)-2b). Based on the evaluation of these <br />observations, water level drawdown in the bedrock zones is expected to only extend about 590 <br />feet beyond the permit boundary. WFC's hydrologic consultant, Bishop -Brogden Associates, <br />Inc. (BBA), prepared Figures 2.05.6(3)-2f and 2.05.6(3)-2g in order to illustrate the observations <br />at GW's N8 and N9. These two figures are contained in Appendix 2.05.6(3)-2. Figure 2.05.6(3)- <br />2c in Appendix 2.05.6(3)-2, is an illustration of the projected draw down from an ideal pit in a <br />stationary position based on the evaluation of the GW -8 and GW -9 hydrographs. Water level <br />measurements were suspended at GW's-N8 and N9 from 1987 through 2007 and the "old" <br />highwall was reclaimed in 1992. Water level monitoring at these two holes was resumed during <br />2008 and 2009 as part of the 2 year "close out" monitoring for New Horizon #1 Area Permit. <br />Water levels in GW -N8 have recovered about 80% of the maximum draw down since the <br />highwall was reclaimed. The 2nd Park Lateral continued to flow during irrigation seasons during <br />the period that GW -N8 and GW -N9 have been monitored and groundwater mounding (seasonal <br />irrigation water infiltration) is apparent on the hydrographs. Maximum draw down occurred in <br />2.75 years; however, the pit along with backfilling and reclamation will migrate at about 550 ft <br />per year or about 1510 ft in 2.75 years. The sense is that water levels in the adjacent bedrock <br />zones will begin to recover before maximum draw down is realized. <br />Modeling Transient simulations were performed for the New Horizon Mine (see New Horizon <br />#2 Area permit) for a five-year period, using the maximum drawdown estimates for the <br />overburden and coal. These drawdown results were expressed as a maximum at the pit and are <br />expressed as a conical depression which results in decreased drawdown at further distance from <br />the mine. For the overburden, the pit drawdown was 5 feet for years 1 and 2, 8 feet during year 3, <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 13 Sept. 2015 (TR -11) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.