My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2016-01-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2017 9:56:06 AM
Creation date
2/11/2016 10:27:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/7/2016
Doc Name
Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3)
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In conclusion, the existing and pending water court decrees and applications, together with the <br />determinations of the professional water engineering consultant, ensure that WFC has adequate <br />water rights for the NHN Mine. <br />Irrigation The NHN Permit area has (since about 1910) and is currently serviced by an <br />extensive man-made irrigation system. The water, primarily used for flood irrigation, is diverted <br />from the San Miguel River approximately 15 miles east of the New Horizon North Mine by the <br />Colorado Cooperative Ditch Company. The irrigation ditches transect drainage basins and <br />commonly run along the basin divides (see Map 2.04.7-1 for location of main irrigation ditch). <br />The main irrigation ditches have a network of feeder ditches running from them for irrigating <br />more distant fields. These ditches are a source of ground water recharge, causing ground water <br />mounding in the shallow ground water bedrock system. The effects of seasonal water mounding <br />near the NHN permit area are apparent from monitor well water levels and hydrographs (see <br />Appendix 2.04.7-1 of Section 2.04.7). Perennial flow occurs in Tuttle Draw and Coal Creek <br />Canyon tributaries as a result of ground water discharge and return flow from the irrigation of the <br />upland area. Site inspections confirm that water used for irrigation is obtained from the San <br />Miguel River and no flood irrigation water is obtained from Tuttle Draw or Meehan Draw. <br />In regard to the agricultural water quality standards, the San Miguel River water delivered by the <br />irrigation ditches is more suitable for irrigation purposes than the waters in the Tuttle Draw or <br />Coal Creek Canyon tributaries. The agricultural suitability (National Academy of Sciences. <br />1972. Water Quality Criteria 1972: National Academy of Engineering, Washington, D.C. p. 335) <br />of surface water in the permit area falls within the category of water that can only be used for salt <br />tolerant plants on permeable soils with careful management practices (TDS from 2,000 to 5,000 <br />mg/1). Using the same classification system, water supplied by the 2nd Park Lateral irrigation <br />ditch with a TDS of 500 mg/1 and lower (although a slightly higher pH of 8.0 and higher) has no <br />detrimental effects on plants as witnessed by the success of irrigation in the area. <br />Since the early part of this century, it has been a regional practice to obtain water for irrigation <br />from the San Miguel River. Because of the incised nature of the drainage channels, it is difficult <br />to flood irrigate from them. From field reconnaissance investigations, no cases of water being <br />pumped from these draws for irrigation purposes has been discovered. <br />Sub -irrigation A small amount of sub -irrigation does occur along the drainage channels. Much <br />of the ground water along these draws is a result of seepage through the weathered zone of the <br />bedrock from the irrigation ditches. In areas where the sub -irrigation occurs, the vegetation and <br />soil quickly dry up when the ditch is turned off from October to April. The sub -irrigation along <br />the drainage bottoms of the NHN permit area is not considered extensive enough to support <br />agricultural development. <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 10 Sept. 2015 (TR -11) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.